Cited by 352Sport Psychology and PerformanceMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsMartial Arts: Techniques, Psychology, and Education

Mindfulness to Enhance Athletic Performance: Theoretical Considerations and Possible Impact Mechanisms

Birrer, Daniel, Röthlin, Philipp, Morgan, Gareth·2012·Mindfulness

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-012-0109-2

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Birrer, D., Röthlin, P., & Morgan, G.
Affiliations
Swiss Federal Institute of Sport Magglingen SFISM (CH)
Corresponding author
Birrer, Daniel
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2012-05-05
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
235-246
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W1995656791
Cited by
352
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 42 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
12.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Martial Arts: Techniques, Psychology, and Education
Keywords
athletic performance, mental training, trait mindfulness, mindfulness practice, impact mechanism, sport psychology, attention, experiential acceptance, values clarification, emotion regulation, self-regulation, non-attachment, rumination, flexibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review