Cited by 14Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Reducing Current Limitations in Order to Enhance the Quality of Subjective Well-Being Research: The Example of Mindfulness

Shankland, Rebecca, Kotsou, Ilios, Cuny, Caroline, Strub, Lionel, Brown, Nicholas J. L.·2017·Happiness Studies Book Series

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-319-61810-4_6

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The difficulty of measuring mindfulness through a self-reported questionnaire may explain why trait-mindfulness was not a significant predictor, as the more participants become mindful, the more they become aware of moments during which they are not mindful.

    “This may underline the difficulty of measuring mindfulness through a self-reported questionnaire, as the more participants become mindful, the more they become aware of the moments during which they are not mindful (for mindfulness measurement limitations, see Shankland et al., 2017).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 87 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shankland, R., Kotsou, I., Cuny, C., Strub, L., & Brown, N. J. L.
Affiliations
  • Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
  • Grenoble Ecole de Management (FR)
  • University of Groningen (NL)
Venue
Happiness Studies Book Series
Published
2017
Pages
107-132
ISSN
  • 2213-7513 (ISSN-L)
  • 2213-7521
OpenAlex
W2740128323
Cited by
14
References
87
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2
FWCI
8.75
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Happiness studies book series (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
mindfulness, trait mindfulness, state mindfulness, mindfulness measurement, self-report questionnaire, measurement bias, life satisfaction, subjective well-being, chimes, mindfulness-based interventions, automatism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review