Cited by 77Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Self-compassion Modulates Heart Rate Variability and Negative Affect to Experimentally Induced Stress

Luo, Xi, Qiao, Lei, Che, Xianwei·2018·Mindfulness

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-018-0900-9

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luo, X., Qiao, L., & Che, X.
Affiliations
  • Southwest University (CN)
  • The Alfred Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Che, Xianwei
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2018-02-17
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
1522-1528
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W2788223951
Cited by
77
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
7.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
Funders
China Scholarship Council (201506990016)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
self-compassion, heart rate variability, negative affect, stress response, Trier Social Stress Test, autonomic nervous system

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review