The DOI matches its Crossref record; 122 of the 123 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Impact of Mindfulness-Based Interventions on the Well-Being of Healthcare Professionals
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Multiple systematic reviews conducted by Lomas et al22 23 achieved similar results with overall study findings reporting that mindfulness was generally associated with positive outcomes in relation to most measures, however, the quality of assessed studies was inconsistent, especially noting the lack of RCT study designs that were eligible for inclusion.”
From Workplace interventions to improve well-being and reduce burnout for nurses, physicians and allied healthcare professionals: a systematic review. (2023) · cites this paper as [23]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“MBE interventions can be implemented quite sustainably as they are generally performed in the workplace (during scheduled breaks) or through self-directed practices.22–24”
From Workplace interventions to improve well-being and reduce burnout for nurses, physicians and allied healthcare professionals: a systematic review. (2023) · cites this paper as [23]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“As such, several recent systematic reviews have reported the benefit of individual focused interventions in healthcare, predominantly highlighting the effectiveness of mindfulness-based practices to improve well-being.22–24”
From Workplace interventions to improve well-being and reduce burnout for nurses, physicians and allied healthcare professionals: a systematic review. (2023) · cites this paper as [23]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“It has been observed that mindfulness practices, for example, in the context of mindfulness-based programs (MBPs), may improve anxiety, depression, psychological distress, and mental well-being in healthcare professionals [30].”
In the citing paper
“To date, systematic reviews and meta-analyses have primarily focused upon empirical investigations into the reduction of stress amongst HCPs using MBSR and are limited to empirical studies published before December 2019.”
From The Effectiveness of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction on the Psychological Functioning of Healthcare Professionals: a Systematic Review (2021) · cites this paper as Lomas et al. 2019
In the citing paper
“They are indicated as therapeutic interventions with scientific evidence for reducing burnout, regulating emotions, improving emotional resilience, and reducing depression among nurses and other HP [5,6,7].”
From The Impact of an Online Mindfulness-Based Practice Program on the Mental Health of Brazilian Nurses during the COVID-19 Pandemic (2023) · cites this paper as [6]
In the citing paper
“In an extensive literature review, Lomas et al. [6] found that most of the 41 included studies showed a statistically significant reduction in stress levels.”
From The Impact of an Online Mindfulness-Based Practice Program on the Mental Health of Brazilian Nurses during the COVID-19 Pandemic (2023) · cites this paper as [6]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2000) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 355,893
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · Cited by 64,042
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
(1994) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/0002-8223(94)92216-0 · Cited by 46,726
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
(2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 44,859
The satisfaction with life scale
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 · Cited by 31,768
Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias
Begg, C. B., & Mazumdar, M. (1994) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533446 · Cited by 16,955
Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education.
O'Shea, D. W., & Richardson, J. G. (1987) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2069964 · Cited by 15,197
Bourdıeu, P. (2002) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470755679.ch15 · Cited by 14,055
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Higgins, J. P., & Green, S. (Eds.). (2011). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions (Vol. 5). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
- National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools. (2008). Quality Assessment Tool For Quantiative Studies (QATQS). Hamilton: McMaster University.
- Pollard, E. L., & Davidson, L. (2001). Foundations of child wellbeing. Paris: UNESCO.
- Schwarzer, G. (2007). Meta: an R package for meta-analysis. R News, 7(3), 40–45.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mindfulness-based interventions: an overall review
Zhang, D., Lee, E. K. P., Mak, E. C. W., Ho, C. Y., & Wong, S. Y. S. (2021) · British Medical Bulletin · doi:10.1093/bmb/ldab005 · Cited by 668
“reducing depression and burnout and improving emotional resilience.(76,77) However,”
BackgroundCohen, C., Pignata, S., Bezak, E., Tie, M., & Childs, J. (2023) · BMJ open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071203 · Cited by 514
“Multiple systematic reviews conducted by Lomas et al 22 23 achieved similar results with overall study findings reporting that mindfulness was generally associated with positive outcomes in relation to most measures, however, the quality of assessed studies was inconsistent, especially noting the…”
ResultKriakous, S. A., Elliott, K. A., Lamers, C., & Owen, R. (2021) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-020-01500-9 · Cited by 342
“Future studies are encouraged to employ robust controlled designs with ‘active’ control groups (Lomas et al. 2019), obtain larger sample sizes and more heterogeneous samples to increase the generalisability of research findings.”
BackgroundGalante, J., Friedrich, C., Dawson, A. F., Modrego-Alarcón, M., Gebbing, P., Delgado-Suárez, I., Gupta, R., Dean, L., Dalgleish, T., White, I. R., et al. (2021) · PLOS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1003481 · Cited by 319
“, [26,37]) neglects to disaggregate trials with active versus passive control groups.”
BackgroundGál, É., Ștefan, S., & Cristea, I. A. (2021) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2020.09.134 · Cited by 289
Metadata
- Authors
- Lomas, T., Medina, J. C., Ivtzan, I., Rupprecht, S., & Eiroa-Orosa, F. J.
- Affiliations
- University of East London (GB)
- Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
- Leuphana University of Lüneburg (DE)
- Venue
- Mindfulness
- Published
- 2018-11-29
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1193-1216
- ISSN
- 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
- 1868-8535
- OpenAlex
- W2902311059
- Cited by
- 152
- References
- 123
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 1.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
- UEL Research Repository (University of East London) (acceptedVersion)
- Dipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- Multilingual Matters (Channel View Publications) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
- Keywords
- mindfulness-based interventions, healthcare workers, well-being, mental health, anxiety, depression, stress, life satisfaction, emotional intelligence, employee well-being
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
