Cited by 412Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutStress and Burnout Research

How Effective are Mindfulness‐Based Interventions for Reducing Stress Among Healthcare Professionals? A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Burton, Amy, Burgess, Catherine, Dean, Sarah, Koutsopoulou, Gina Z., Hugh‐Jones, Siobhan·2017·Stress and Health

Abstract

Workplace stress is high among healthcare professionals (HCPs) and is associated with reduced psychological health, quality of care and patient satisfaction. This systematic review and meta‐analysis reviews evidence on the effectiveness of mindfulness‐based interventions (MBIs) for reducing stress in HCPs. A systematic literature search was conducted. Papers were screened for suitability using inclusion criteria and nine papers were subjected to review and quality assessment. Seven papers, for which full statistical findings could be obtained, were also subjected to meta‐analysis. Results of the meta‐analysis suggest that MBIs have the potential to significantly improve stress among HCPs; however, there was evidence of a file drawer problem. The quality of the studies was high in relation to the clarity of aims, data collection and analysis, but weaker in terms of sample size and the use of theoretical frameworks. MBIs have the potential to reduce stress among HCPs; however, more high‐quality research is needed before this finding can be confirmed. Future studies would benefit from long‐term follow‐up measures to determine any continuing effects of mindfulness training on stress outcomes. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This systematic review and meta-analysis found that mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) have the potential to significantly reduce stress among healthcare professionals, with a medium combined effect size. However, the authors caution that evidence of a file drawer problem and methodological weaknesses mean more high-quality research is needed before the finding can be confirmed.

Key findings

  • Across 9 reviewed studies, 8 reported significant positive effects of MBIs on stress among healthcare professionals; 1 did not (Horner et al., 2014).
  • Meta-analysis of 7 studies with 188 participants found a combined effect size of r = 0.342 (CI = 0.202–0.468), a medium effect, with combined probability p < .00002; studies were homogeneous (heterogeneity p > 0.05).
  • Evidence of a file drawer problem was present: 44 non-significant studies would be needed to render the findings non-significant, while 45 additional non-significant studies are likely to exist.
  • Quality assessment showed studies scored highest on clarity of aims, data collection, and method of data collection, but weaker on sample size and use of theoretical frameworks; inter-rater reliability was Krippendorff’s Alpha = 0.8221 (95% CI 0.7436–0.8914).

Methods

  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of intervention studies using mindfulness as a key component to reduce stress among practicing healthcare professionals; searches covered MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and BNI, with initial searches in December 2013 and top-up searches in February, June, and August 2015.
  • Inclusion required an MBI evaluation, practicing healthcare professionals, and a pre- and post-intervention stress outcome measure; 9 papers were included in the review, and 7 with obtainable statistical data were meta-analyzed.
  • Methodological quality was assessed with the QATSDD; effect sizes were converted to r, transformed to Fisher’s Z, and used to calculate weighted mean effect, confidence interval, combined probability, heterogeneity, and publication bias checks.

Limitations

  • The paper states that the review focused only on stress as an outcome, so burnout could not be meta-analyzed because it was not consistently reported; meta-analysis was also limited to immediate follow-up data, so long-term impact cannot be concluded.
  • The paper states that more high-quality research is needed, including longitudinal studies, cost-effectiveness assessment, and investigation of lower-dose MBIs and intervention fidelity.
  • Evident from the text: many included studies had small, self-selected samples, several had no control group, attrition was high in some studies (30%, 40%, 35%, and 44%), and lack of detail on intervention design, content, and delivery limits conclusions about active ingredients.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/smi.2673

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 61 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingnone given
    § Conclusion · p. 16

    High dropout rates were reported in the reviewed studies.

    “high dropout rates reported”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § Discussion · p. 14

    All four studies that measured state mindfulness reported increases in mindfulness.

    “while all reported increases in mindfulness”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingcitation
    § Discussion · p. 13

    Shapiro et al. (2005) reported a 44% attrition rate only in the intervention group when compared to a wait-list control.

    “This is supported by the pattern of attrition rates in one randomised controlled trial included in this review; for example, Shapiro et al. (2005), reported a 44% attrition rate only in the intervention group when compared to a wait-list control.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Shapiro et al. (2005)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Findingown data
    § Synthesis of the results: meta-analysis · p. 11

    The combined effect size of mindfulness-based interventions on stress among healthcare professionals was r=0.342 (CI = 0.202-0.468), a medium effect size.

    “The combined effect size was r=0.342 (CI = 0.202-0.468), which is a medium effect size according to Coh en's (1988) guidelines.”
    • Also stated in: § Discussion · p. 12 · plain
      “The reviewed MBIs were found to have a moderate effect on HCP stress levels.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingcitation
    § Synthesis of the results: meta-analysis · p. 12

    There was evidence of a potential file drawer problem.

    “However, there was evidence of a potential file drawer problem (Rosenthal, 1991).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rosenthal, 1991

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 45
  • May combine two claims. 14
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data
    § Synthesis of the results: meta-analysis · p. 11

    The meta-analysis included a total of 188 participants.

    “The remaining seven studies were included in the meta-analysis with a total of 188 participants.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data
    § Participants and Settings · p. 8

    Seven studies provided attrition data.

    “Seven studies provided attrition data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § Participants and Settings · p. 8

    Attrition rates in four studies were 30%, 40%, 35%, and 44% respectively.

    “Attrition in the Brady et al. (2012) study was 30% (baseline n=16), in the Horner et al. (2014) study was 40% (17 of the 43 participants did not attend 5 or more of the 30 minute classes), in the Manotas et al. (2014) study was 35% (23 of 66 participants did not complete the intervention), and in the Shapiro et al. (2005) study was 44% (baseline n=38).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Brady et al. (2012)

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Horner et al. (2014)

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Manotas et al. (2014)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data
    § Study quality · p. 10

    Highest quality scores were for clarity of aims, description of data collection, and method of data collection.

    “Highest scores were for: clarity of aims, description of data collection, and method of data collection.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingreasoning
    § Search Strategy · p. 6

    Nine papers were included in the review.

    “Following all searches, 9 papers were included in the review.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § Key findings · p. 9

    Eight studies reported significant positive effects of mindfulness-based interventions on stress among healthcare professionals, and one study did not.

    “Eight studies reported significant positive effects of MBIs on stress among healthcare professionals, one study did not (Horner et al., 2014).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Horner et al., 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Limitations of this review · p. 15

    Burnout was examined in several studies but not consistently reported, so meta-analysis could not be performed.

    “Whilst burnout was examined in several studies it was not consistently reported and therefore meta-analysis could not be performed.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning
    § Synthesis of the results: meta-analysis · p. 12

    Forty-four non-significant studies would be needed to render the findings non-significant and 45 additional non-significant studies are likely to exist.

    “For this metaanalysis, 44 non-significant studies would be needed to render the findings non-significant and 45 additional non-significant studies are likely to exist.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation
    § Study quality · p. 11

    Reasons for attrition were reported in three studies: work pressures, shift patterns, and a combination of health, family and work pressures.

    “Reasons for attrition were reported in three studies; these included work pressures (Brady et al., 2012), shift patterns (Horner et al., 2014), and a combination of health, family and work pressures (Shapiro et al., 2005).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Brady et al., 2012

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Horner et al., 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Shapiro et al., 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingnone given
    § Conclusion · p. 16

    Mindfulness-based interventions require time commitments.

    “Given the time commitments needed”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingown data
    § Synthesis of the results: meta-analysis · p. 11

    Seven papers were included in the meta-analysis.

    “The remaining seven studies were included in the meta-analysis with a total of 188 participants.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Introduction · p. 4

    One meta-analytic review reported that MBSR interventions appear to benefit healthcare professionals in particular compared to other healthy stressed populations.

    “One meta-analytic review reported that interventions employing Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction (MBSR), which was originally developed by Kabat-Zinn (1982, 1990) and combines mindfulness meditation with Yoga, appear to benefit HCPs in particular, at least when compared to other healthy stressed populations exposed to the intervention (e.g. students, academics, teachers and community groups) (Kh”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Khoury et al., 2015

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Introduction · p. 3

    Previous meta-analysis indicates a small effect of mindfulness-based interventions in people with vascular disease.

    “and a small effect in people with vascular disease (Abbott et al., 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Abbott et al., 2014

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Introduction · p. 3

    Mindfulness-based interventions are recommended by the NHS and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence for the prevention and management of stress.

    “Mindfulness-based-interventions (MBIs) are recommended by the NHS and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) for the prevention and management of stress (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2009).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § References · p. 23

    In Fortney et al. (2013), there was a significant decrease in emotional exhaustion.

    “Significant decrease in emotional exhaustion and depersonalization. Significant improvement in personal accomplishment, anxiety, depression. Effect was maintained over 9 months.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fortney et al. (2013)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § References · p. 23

    In Fortney et al. (2013), there was a significant improvement in depression.

    “Significant decrease in emotional exhaustion and depersonalization. Significant improvement in personal accomplishment, anxiety, depression. Effect was maintained over 9 months.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fortney et al. (2013)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Discussion · p. 15

    By reducing staff stress, mindfulness-based interventions could reduce sickness absence and improve job satisfaction, with the potential to benefit the employer, the employee, and consequently patients and service users within the healthcare system.

    “Furthermore, by reducing staff stress, MBIs could reduce sickness absence and improve job satisfaction, with the potential to benefit the employer, the employee, and consequently patients and service users within the healthcare system (Fortney et al., 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fortney et al., 2013

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Discussion · p. 13

    The investment required for mindfulness-based interventions is considerable and may be impractical for many healthcare professionals.

    “Consequently, the investment required is considerable and may be impractical for many healthcare professionals.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § References · p. 23

    In Fortney et al. (2013), there was a significant improvement in anxiety.

    “Significant decrease in emotional exhaustion and depersonalization. Significant improvement in personal accomplishment, anxiety, depression. Effect was maintained over 9 months.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fortney et al. (2013)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Discussion · p. 15

    The promising findings from these small scale studies could have real, practical benefits.

    “Despite this, the promising findings from these small scale studies could have real, practical benefits.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § References · p. 23

    In Brady et al. (2012), there was a significant improvement in overall sense of self.

    “Significant improvement in mindfulness, stress, and overall sense of self.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Brady et al. (2012)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion · p. 15

    Lack of detail on intervention design, content and delivery is a problem prevalent in publications of behaviour change interventions more generally.

    “An additional challenge is the lack of detail on intervention design, content and delivery; a problem prevalent in publications of behaviour change interventions more generally (Michie et al., 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Michie et al., 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation
    § Discussion · p. 14

    Reductions in stress may have been supported by the group effect.

    “Alternatively, reductions in stress may have been supported by the group effect.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § References · p. 23

    In Fortney et al. (2013), there was a significant improvement in personal accomplishment.

    “Significant decrease in emotional exhaustion and depersonalization. Significant improvement in personal accomplishment, anxiety, depression. Effect was maintained over 9 months.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fortney et al. (2013)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § Discussion · p. 12

    The finding of a moderate effect of mindfulness-based interventions on healthcare professional stress lends support to Khoury et al. (2015), who reported that MBSR is a moderately effective intervention for reducing stress in healthcare professionals.

    “This finding lends support to Khoury et al. (2015) who reported that MBSR is a moderately effective intervention for reducing stress in HCPs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Khoury et al. (2015)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § References · p. 23

    In Fortney et al. (2013), there was a significant decrease in depersonalization.

    “Significant decrease in emotional exhaustion and depersonalization. Significant improvement in personal accomplishment, anxiety, depression. Effect was maintained over 9 months.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fortney et al. (2013)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § References · p. 23

    In Brady et al. (2012), there was a significant improvement in mindfulness.

    “Significant improvement in mindfulness, stress, and overall sense of self.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Brady et al. (2012)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Discussion · p. 15

    This lack of detail makes it difficult to differentiate between programmes and prohibits analysis of which components are most strongly predictive of positive outcomes.

    “This lack of detail makes it difficult to differentiate between programmes and prohibits analysis of which components are most strongly predictive of positive outcomes (Carroll et al., 2007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Carroll et al., 2007

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given
    § Limitations of this review · p. 15

    This review has only focussed on stress as an outcome measure.

    “This review has only focussed on stress as an outcome measure.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Discussion · p. 14

    The effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions for healthcare professionals is likely to be influenced by usually unmeasured variables such as readiness to change, motivation to change, education, and psychoeducation.

    “The effectiveness of MBIs for HCPs is also likely to be influenced by a number of, usually unmeasured, variables.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Discussion · p. 14

    The majority of studies included a pre-post design and decreases in stress may have resulted from testing effects.

    “For example, the majority of studies included a pre-post design and decreases in stress may have resulted from testing effects.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § References · p. 23

    In Brady et al. (2012), there was a significant improvement in stress.

    “Significant improvement in mindfulness, stress, and overall sense of self.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Brady et al. (2012)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § References · p. 25

    In Shapiro et al. (2005), there was a significant reduction in stress in the intervention group.

    “Significant reduction in stress and self-compassion in intervention group. Self-compassion”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Shapiro et al. (2005)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § References · p. 24

    In Martin-Asuero and Garcia-Banda (2010), there was a significant difference in the combined means between pre-, post- and follow up measures.

    “Significant reduction in psychological distress, daily stress, rumination and negative affect. Significant difference in the combined means between pre-, post- and follow up measures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Martin-Asuero and Garcia- Banda (2010)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § References · p. 24

    In Horner et al. (2014), there were improvements in patient satisfaction among the intervention group, but not statistically significant.

    “Improvements in mindfulness, burnout, stress and patient satisfaction among intervention group, but not statistically significant”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Horner et al. (2014)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § References · p. 24

    In Horner et al. (2014), there were improvements in stress among the intervention group, but not statistically significant.

    “Improvements in mindfulness, burnout, stress and patient satisfaction among intervention group, but not statistically significant”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Horner et al. (2014)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § References · p. 24

    In Martin-Asuero and Garcia-Banda (2010), there was a significant reduction in daily stress.

    “Significant reduction in psychological distress, daily stress, rumination and negative affect. Significant difference in the combined means between pre-, post- and follow up measures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Martin-Asuero and Garcia- Banda (2010)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § References · p. 24

    In Foureur et al. (2013), participants reported the intervention as enjoyable.

    “Significant improvements in health, SOC-Orientation to life and stress. Participants reported the intervention as enjoyable.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Foureur et al. (2013)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § References · p. 24

    In Manotas et al. (2014), there were significant improvements in anxiety post-intervention.

    “Significant improvements in mindfulness, stress, depression and anxiety post-intervention.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Manotas et al. (2014)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § References · p. 25

    In Shapiro et al. (2005), there was a significant reduction in self-compassion in the intervention group.

    “Significant reduction in stress and self-compassion in intervention group. Self-compassion”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Shapiro et al. (2005)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § References · p. 24

    In Foureur et al. (2013), there were significant improvements in SOC-Orientation to life.

    “Significant improvements in health, SOC-Orientation to life and stress. Participants reported the intervention as enjoyable.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Foureur et al. (2013)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § References · p. 24

    In Foureur et al. (2013), there were significant improvements in stress.

    “Significant improvements in health, SOC-Orientation to life and stress. Participants reported the intervention as enjoyable.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Foureur et al. (2013)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § References · p. 23

    In Fortney et al. (2013), the effect was maintained over 9 months.

    “Significant decrease in emotional exhaustion and depersonalization. Significant improvement in personal accomplishment, anxiety, depression. Effect was maintained over 9 months.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fortney et al. (2013)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § References · p. 24

    In Martin-Asuero and Garcia-Banda (2010), there was a significant reduction in psychological distress.

    “Significant reduction in psychological distress, daily stress, rumination and negative affect. Significant difference in the combined means between pre-, post- and follow up measures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Martin-Asuero and Garcia- Banda (2010)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § References · p. 24

    In Manotas et al. (2014), there were significant improvements in depression post-intervention.

    “Significant improvements in mindfulness, stress, depression and anxiety post-intervention.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Manotas et al. (2014)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § References · p. 24

    In Foureur et al. (2013), there were significant improvements in health.

    “Significant improvements in health, SOC-Orientation to life and stress. Participants reported the intervention as enjoyable.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Foureur et al. (2013)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § References · p. 24

    In Martin-Asuero and Garcia-Banda (2010), there was a significant reduction in negative affect.

    “Significant reduction in psychological distress, daily stress, rumination and negative affect. Significant difference in the combined means between pre-, post- and follow up measures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Martin-Asuero and Garcia- Banda (2010)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § References · p. 24

    In Horner et al. (2014), there were improvements in mindfulness among the intervention group, but not statistically significant.

    “Improvements in mindfulness, burnout, stress and patient satisfaction among intervention group, but not statistically significant”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Horner et al. (2014)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § References · p. 24

    In Manotas et al. (2014), there were significant improvements in mindfulness post-intervention.

    “Significant improvements in mindfulness, stress, depression and anxiety post-intervention.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Manotas et al. (2014)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § References · p. 24

    In Horner et al. (2014), there were improvements in burnout among the intervention group, but not statistically significant.

    “Improvements in mindfulness, burnout, stress and patient satisfaction among intervention group, but not statistically significant”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Horner et al. (2014)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § References · p. 24

    In Martin-Asuero and Garcia-Banda (2010), there was a significant reduction in rumination.

    “Significant reduction in psychological distress, daily stress, rumination and negative affect. Significant difference in the combined means between pre-, post- and follow up measures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Martin-Asuero and Garcia- Banda (2010)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § References · p. 24

    In Manotas et al. (2014), there were significant improvements in stress post-intervention.

    “Significant improvements in mindfulness, stress, depression and anxiety post-intervention.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Manotas et al. (2014)

      Not checked in the free run.

52 of 52
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Self-selected participants are standard and preferred practice for mindfulness-based interventions, and these interventions are most effective when individuals choose to engage.

    “All studies used self-selected participants; this is standard and preferred practice for MBIs as this type of intervention is believed to be most effective when individuals choose to engage.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Mindfulness is an activity requiring a high level of engagement and commitment, with participants often asked to complete intervention homework.

    “Mindfulness is an activity requiring a high level of engagement and commitment, with participants often asked not only to take part in the intervention sessions, but to also complete intervention 'homework' (namely personal mindfulness practices).”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous meta-analyses indicate a moderate to large within-group and between-group effect of MBIs on stress in the general population and healthcare professionals, but these interventions did not appear as effective in reducing burnout or improving resilience for healthcare professionals.

    “Previous meta-analyses of MBIs indicate a moderate to large within-group and between-group effect on stress in the general population11 and healthcare professionals,14 15 but these interventions did not appear as effective in reducing burnout or improving resilience for healthcare professionals.15”

    From Effectiveness of mindfulness-based interventions on the well-being of healthcare workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2024) · cites this paper as [14]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Numerous clinical trials have demonstrated that mindfulness can assist with a wide range of mental health symptoms in adult populations.

    “numerous clinical trials have demonstrated that mindfulness can assist with a wide range of mental health symptoms in adult populations [18–28].”

    From Acceptance and commitment therapy universal prevention program for adolescents: a feasibility study. (2017) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Key findings (p. 9) report improvements in stress, depression, anxiety, burnout and other outcomes among healthcare professionals. But the Study characteristics (p. 7) identify only two randomized controlled trials among nine studies; most used pre-post designs. The review therefore supports benefits across several symptoms in this occupational group, but not the broader assertion that numerous clinical trials demonstrated them across adult populations. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Mindfulness-based interventions may be well-suited to address burnout in HCPs.

    “Mindfulness-based interventions may be well-suited to address burnout in HCPs.”
  • Earlier systematic reviews and meta-analyses of MBSR for healthcare professionals concentrated on stress reduction and only covered studies published before December 2019.

    “To date, systematic reviews and meta-analyses have primarily focused upon empirical investigations into the reduction of stress amongst HCPs using MBSR and are limited to empirical studies published before December 2019.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • File-drawer risk is described as small despite the stated threshold being exceeded

    Major

    The paper says 44 non-significant studies would make the result non-significant and that 45 are likely to exist. Its description of this as a very small risk conflicts with those stated figures.

  • Reported maximum sample size is below a stated study baseline

    Minor

    The stated maximum sample size is 52, but the attrition account gives the Manotas study 66 participants.

  • Reported quality-score range excludes a score in Table 1

    Minor

    The text says every paper scored between 20 and 25, but Table 1 gives the Manotas study a quality score of 35.

3 of 3

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. PickerInstitute. (2012).National Health Service Survey England 2012. Oxford. Retrieved fromhttp://www.nhsstaffsurveys.com/Page/1037/Past‐Results/Staff‐Survey‐2012‐Detailed‐Spreadsheets/

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burton, A., Burgess, C., Dean, S., Koutsopoulou, G. Z., & Hugh‐Jones, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Staffordshire (GB)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
Corresponding author
Burton, Amy
Venue
Stress and Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-02-25
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
3-13
ISSN
  • 1532-2998 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-3005
OpenAlex
W2280111206
Cited by
412
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 5
FWCI
3.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Stress and Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Staffordshire Online Repository (Staffordshire University) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (ES/K000632/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
Keywords
mindfulness-based interventions, occupational stress, healthcare workers, stress reduction, psychological well-being, quality of care, patient satisfaction
MeSH terms
Health Personnel, Humans, Stress, Psychological, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review