Cited by 8Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsCognitive Abilities and Testing

The Effect of Mindfulness on Cognitive Reflection and Reasoning

Open access
Farrar, Stephanie T., Yarrow, Kielan, Tapper, Katy·2020·Mindfulness

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12671-020-01429-z

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Farrar, S. T., Yarrow, K., & Tapper, K.
Affiliations
City, University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Farrar, Stephanie T.
Venue
Mindfulness
Published
2020-06-08
Volume
11
Issue
9
Pages
2150-2160
ISSN
  • 1868-8527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1868-8535
OpenAlex
W3034349617
Cited by
7
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3
FWCI
0.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mindfulness (publishedVersion)
  • City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
City, University of London
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
cognitive reflection, reasoning, thought experiments, decentering, trait mindfulness, syllogistic reasoning, mindfulness training

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review