Cited by 110Embodied and Extended CognitionCybernetics and Technology in SocietyDigital Media and Philosophy

The Cognitive Integration of E-Memory

Clowes, Robert W.·2013·Review of Philosophy and Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13164-013-0130-y

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clowes, R. W.
Affiliations
Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT)
Corresponding author
Clowes, Robert W.
Venue
Review of Philosophy and Psychology
Published
2013-01-26
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
107-133
ISSN
  • 1878-5158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1878-5166
OpenAlex
W1978459056
Cited by
110
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Review of Philosophy and Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Digital Media and Philosophy
Keywords
digital memory, extended mind, embedded cognition, technical artifacts, memory enhancement, totality, autonomy, entanglement, philosophy of mind

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review