Cited by 164Cybernetics and Technology in SocietyEmbodied and Extended CognitionPhilosophy and Theoretical Science

A Taxonomy of Cognitive Artifacts: Function, Information, and Categories

Open access
Heersmink, Richard·2013·Review of Philosophy and Psychology

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13164-013-0148-1

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ChatGPT can be considered a cognitive artifact because its function is to contribute to the solving of human cognitive tasks.

    “Despite there being no universally shared definition of 'cognitive task' (Fasoli, 2017), and despite ChatGPT not being a cognitive system per se, it can still be considered a cognitive artifact since its function is to contribute to the solving of human cognitive tasks (Norman, 1991;Heersmink, 2013;Casati 2017;Fasoli, 2018).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. R.A. Wilson and F.C. Keil, 126-128. MIT Press.
  2. Peirce, C.S. 1935a. The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce vol 2. Harvard University Press.
  3. Peirce, C.S. 1935b. The collected papers of Charles S. Peirce vol 3. Harvard University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heersmink, R.
Affiliations
Macquarie University (AU)
Corresponding author
Heersmink, Richard
Venue
Review of Philosophy and Psychology
Published
2013-05-25
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
465-481
ISSN
  • 1878-5158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1878-5166
OpenAlex
W2005343546
Cited by
164
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3
FWCI
26.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Review of Philosophy and Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Cybernetics and Technology in Society
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Keywords
cognitive artifacts, taxonomy (general classification scheme), information, cognitive performance, human-made objects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review