Cited by 47Ethics and Social Impacts of AIDigital Media and PhilosophyNatural Language Processing Techniques

Use of large language models might affect our cognitive skills

Heersmink, Richard·2024·Nature Human Behaviour

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41562-024-01859-y

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heersmink, R.
Affiliations
Tilburg University (NL)
Corresponding author
Heersmink, Richard
Venue
Nature Human Behaviour
Published
2024-03-22
Volume
8
Issue
5
Pages
805-806
ISSN
2397-3374 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4393086197
Cited by
44
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 5
FWCI
18.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Human Behaviour (publishedVersion)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Digital Media and Philosophy
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
Keywords
large language models, cognitive skills, writing skills, thinking skills, generative AI, human-AI interaction
MeSH terms
Cognition, Humans, Language

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review