Cited by 943Fish Ecology and Management StudiesAquatic Ecosystems and BiodiversityFreshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 92 of the 100 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 4 of the 61 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Scientists’ warning to humanity on the freshwater biodiversity crisis

Open access

Abstract

Freshwater ecosystems provide irreplaceable services for both nature and society. The quality and quantity of freshwater affect biogeochemical processes and ecological dynamics that determine biodiversity, ecosystem productivity, and human health and welfare at local, regional and global scales. Freshwater ecosystems and their associated riparian habitats are amongst the most biologically diverse on Earth, and have inestimable economic, health, cultural, scientific and educational values. Yet human impacts to lakes, rivers, streams, wetlands and groundwater are dramatically reducing biodiversity and robbing critical natural resources and services from current and future generations. Freshwater biodiversity is declining rapidly on every continent and in every major river basin on Earth, and this degradation is occurring more rapidly than in terrestrial ecosystems. Currently, about one third of all global freshwater discharges pass through human agricultural, industrial or urban infrastructure. About one fifth of the Earth's arable land is now already equipped for irrigation, including all the most productive lands, and this proportion is projected to surpass one third by midcentury to feed the rapidly expanding populations of humans and commensal species, especially poultry and ruminant livestock. Less than one fifth of the world's preindustrial freshwater wetlands remain, and this proportion is projected to decline to under one tenth by midcentury, with imminent threats from water transfer megaprojects in Brazil and India, and coastal wetland drainage megaprojects in China. The Living Planet Index for freshwater vertebrate populations has declined to just one third that of 1970, and is projected to sink below one fifth by midcentury. A linear model of global economic expansion yields the chilling prediction that human utilization of critical freshwater resources will approach one half of the Earth's total capacity by midcentury. Although the magnitude and growth of the human freshwater footprint are greater than is generally understood by policy makers, the news media, or the general public, slowing and reversing dramatic losses of freshwater species and ecosystems is still possible. We recommend a set of urgent policy actions that promote clean water, conserve watershed services, and restore freshwater ecosystems and their vital services. Effective management of freshwater resources and ecosystems must be ranked amongst humanity's highest priorities.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13280-020-01318-8

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

35 Not checked yet · 6 Own result · 5 Own interpretation · 5 No basis given · 4 Sources not found · 1 Supported · 1 Partly supported · accuracy not yet measured

Verify all 51 references — free account

Show all 24 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 33
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 1
33 of 33
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Humanity can still halt and undo the sharp declines in freshwater life and habitats.

    “slowing and reversing dramatic losses of freshwater species and ecosystems is still possible.”
    “Slowing and reversing the dramatic losses of freshwater species and ecosystems is still possible.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    If current practices continue, the past straight-line growth in human use of freshwater and land resources will persist.

    “Therefore, a linear growth model may be able to persist well into this century, despite the obvious crises that would follow as we reach or surpass the Earth's freshwater capacity.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Technologies already exist that can manage and reduce many parts of the freshwater biodiversity crisis.

    “We currently have technologies to manage and ameliorate many aspects of the freshwater biodiversity crisis-what we lack is political will.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Tropical developing countries will see the largest increases in human density and per-capita water use over the next 50 years.

    “These countries expect the greatest increases in human density and per-capita water consumption in the next 50 years.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A world with reduced freshwater will harm many dimensions of human welfare.

    “A world with diminished freshwaters will impoverish many aspects of human welfare, and we risk further damaging these essential life-support systems at our peril.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Moving agricultural and bioenergy production from high-income to low-income tropical regions would increase threats to species-rich tropical aquatic ecosystems.

    “However, we must not relocate agricultural and bioenergy production from highincome to low-income tropical regions, which will further threaten species-rich tropical aquatic ecosystems.”
6 of 6

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

2 of 2

Citations

Cites

Show all 100 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Sengupta, S., and W. Cai. 2019. A quarter of humanity faces looming water crises. New York Times. Aug. 6: 2019.
  2. WWF. 2016. Living planet: Report 2016: Risk and resilience in a new era. Gland: World Wide Fund for Nature.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 801–900 of 940

Metadata

Authors
Albert, J. S., Destouni, G., Duke-Sylvester, S. M., Magurran, A. E., Oberdorff, T., Reis, R. E., Winemiller, K. O., & Ripple, W. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Louisiana at Lafayette (US)
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • University of St Andrews (GB)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (BR)
  • Texas A&M University at Galveston (US)
  • Oregon State University (US)
Corresponding author
Albert, James S.
Venue
Ambio
Published
2020-02-10
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
85-94
ISSN
  • 0044-7447 (ISSN-L)
  • 1654-7209
OpenAlex
W3006601371
Cited by
943
References
100
Citations by year
2026: 149 · 2025: 175 · 2024: 181 · 2023: 149 · 2022: 156 · 2021: 107 · 2020: 24
FWCI
69.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • AMBIO (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository) (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • PUCRS Repository (Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0614334, 0741450, 1354511)
  • Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas (2016-02045)
  • H2020 European Research Council (AdG 250189)
  • Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia de Ciência Animal (306455/2014-5)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Aquatic Ecosystems and Biodiversity
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
Keywords
freshwater ecosystem degradation, freshwater biodiversity loss, irrigation expansion, Living Planet Index, ecosystem services, ecological restoration, watershed management
MeSH terms
Brazil, China, Conservation of Natural Resources, Fresh Water, Humans, India, Ecosystem, Biodiversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-05, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-05 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review