Cited by 106EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesSpeech Recognition and SynthesisVoice and Speech Disorders

Brain-Computer Interface: Applications to Speech Decoding and Synthesis to Augment Communication

Open access
Luo, Shiyu, Rabbani, Qinwan, Crone, Nathan E.·2022·Neurotherapeutics

Abstract

Damage or degeneration of motor pathways necessary for speech and other movements, as in brainstem strokes or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), can interfere with efficient communication without affecting brain structures responsible for language or cognition. In the worst-case scenario, this can result in the locked in syndrome (LIS), a condition in which individuals cannot initiate communication and can only express themselves by answering yes/no questions with eye blinks or other rudimentary movements. Existing augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices that rely on eye tracking can improve the quality of life for people with this condition, but brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are also increasingly being investigated as AAC devices, particularly when eye tracking is too slow or unreliable. Moreover, with recent and ongoing advances in machine learning and neural recording technologies, BCIs may offer the only means to go beyond cursor control and text generation on a computer, to allow real-time synthesis of speech, which would arguably offer the most efficient and expressive channel for communication. The potential for BCI speech synthesis has only recently been realized because of seminal studies of the neuroanatomical and neurophysiological underpinnings of speech production using intracranial electrocorticographic (ECoG) recordings in patients undergoing epilepsy surgery. These studies have shown that cortical areas responsible for vocalization and articulation are distributed over a large area of ventral sensorimotor cortex, and that it is possible to decode speech and reconstruct its acoustics from ECoG if these areas are recorded with sufficiently dense and comprehensive electrode arrays. In this article, we review these advances, including the latest neural decoding strategies that range from deep learning models to the direct concatenation of speech units. We also discuss state-of-the-art vocoders that are integral in constructing natural-sounding audio waveforms for speech BCIs. Finally, this review outlines some of the challenges ahead in directly synthesizing speech for patients with LIS.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13311-022-01190-2

Cites

107 of 107 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Brain-computer interfaces can enable communication for people with paralysis by transforming cortical activity associated with attempted speech into text on a computer screen.

    “Brain-computer interfaces can enable communication for people with paralysis by transforming cortical activity associated with attempted speech into text on a computer screen.”

    From An Accurate and Rapidly Calibrating Speech Neuroprosthesis (2024) · cites this paper as [6]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Chang EF, Anumanchipalli GK. Toward a speech neuroprosthe- sis. JAMA. 2020;323:413-4.
  2. Kastner S, editor. Elife. 2017;6:e18554.
  3. Leon-Carrion J, von Wild KRH, Zitnay GA. Brain injury treat- ment: theories and practices. Taylor & Francis; 2006.
  4. Chomsky N. Syntactic structures [Internet]. Syntactic Struct. De Gruyter Mouton; 2009 [cited 2021 Oct 21]. Available from: https:// www. degru yter. com/ docum ent/ doi/ 10. 1515/ 97831 10218 329/ html. · DOI
  5. Sutskever I, Vinyals O, Le QV. Sequence to sequence learning with neural networks. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst [Internet].
  6. Oord A van den, Dieleman S, Zen H, et al. Wavenet: a genera- tive model for raw audio. ArXiv Prepr ArXiv160903499. 2016.
  7. Kalchbrenner N, Elsen E, Simonyan K, et al. Efficient neural audio synthesis. Proc 35th Int Conf Mach Learn [Internet]. PMLR; 2018 [cited 2021 Dec 16]. p. 2410-2419. Available from: https:// proce edings. mlr. press/ v80/ kalch brenn er18a. html.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luo, S., Rabbani, Q., & Crone, N. E.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Luo, Shiyu
Venue
Neurotherapeutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-01
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
263-273
ISSN
1878-7479 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4210261408
Cited by
106
References
107
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 3
FWCI
10.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurotherapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (UH3NS114439)
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (U01DC016686)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
Keywords
brain-computer interface, speech decoding, locked-in syndrome, augmentative and alternative communication, intracranial electrocorticography, vocoder, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, brainstem infarction, neural decoding, deep learning
MeSH terms
Electrocorticography, Communication, Humans, Quality of Life, Speech, Brain-Computer Interfaces

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review