Cited by 32Obesity, Physical Activity, DietEating Disorders and BehaviorsRegulation of Appetite and Obesity

The physiological effects of weight-cycling: A review of current evidence

Open access
Sanaya, Nora, Janusaite, Monika, Dalamaga, Maria, Magkos, Faidon·2024·Current Obesity Reports

Abstract

Purpose of review There is a common perception among the public that yo-yo dieting, defined as repeated cycles of weight loss followed by weight regain, results in accumulation of fat in the body and lower metabolic rate, thus hindering subsequent attempts to lose weight. We evaluated the effects of weight-cycling on body weight and body mass index (BMI), body composition including fat mass (FM) and lean body mass (LBM), and resting metabolic rate (RMR), by systematically reviewing existing scientific literature.Recent findings Twenty-three cross-sectional and cohort studies (including subjects with a history of weight-cycling compared to those without such history) and interventional studies (evaluating physiological effects during one or more cycles of weight loss and regain) were identified, conducted in generally healthy adults across various age groups, races, and both genders, who had normal weight, overweight, or obesity. Eighteen studies investigated the association between weight-cycling and body weight or BMI, and thirteen of them found no significant association. Fifteen out of twenty studies also found no increase in FM, and none of eighteen studies found a decrease in LBM. Twelve out of fourteen studies reported no adverse changes in RMR either. The overwhelming majority of evidence suggests that weight-cycling (yo-yo effect) is not associated with any adverse effects in body weight, body composition, and metabolic rate. Accordingly, healthy individuals who struggle with overweight or obesity should not be discouraged from repeated attempts to lose the excess weight.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13679-023-00539-8

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 55 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sanaya, N., Janusaite, M., Dalamaga, M., & Magkos, F.
Affiliations
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Magkos, Faidon
Venue
Current Obesity Reports
Published
2024-01-03
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
35-50
ISSN
2162-4968 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4390547017
Cited by
31
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9
FWCI
2.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Obesity Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
Keywords
weight cycling, yo-yo dieting, body composition, fat mass, lean body mass, resting metabolic rate, body mass index, obesity, overweight, weight loss interventions
MeSH terms
Adult, Body Composition, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Obesity, Weight Gain, Weight Loss, Body Mass Index, Overweight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review