The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Synthetic polymeric biomaterials for wound healing: a review
Open accessAbstract
Wounds are of a variety of types and each category has its own distinctive healing requirements. This realization has spurred the development of a myriad of wound dressings, each with specific characteristics. It is unrealistic to expect a singular dressing to embrace all characteristics that would fulfill generic needs for wound healing. However, each dressing may approach the ideal requirements by deviating from the 'one size fits all approach', if it conforms strictly to the specifications of the wound and the patient. Indeed, a functional wound dressing should achieve healing of the wound with minimal time and cost expenditures. This article offers an insight into several different types of polymeric materials clinically used in wound dressings and the events taking place at cellular level, which aid the process of healing, while the biomaterial dressing interacts with the body tissue. Hence, the significance of using synthetic polymer films, foam dressings, hydrocolloids, alginate dressings, and hydrogels has been reviewed, and the properties of these materials that conform to wound-healing requirements have been explored. A special section on bioactive dressings and bioengineered skin substitutes that play an active part in healing process has been re-examined in this work.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Factors affecting wound healing
Guo, S., & DiPietro, L. A. (2010) · Journal of Dental Research · doi:10.1177/0022034509359125 · Cited by 5,792
Main properties and current applications of some polysaccharides as biomaterials
Rinaudo, M. (2008) · Polymer International · doi:10.1002/pi.2378 · Cited by 1,028 · cited 1×
“Alginate produced from bacteria may have better physical properties and chemical properties as compared to alginate that is extracted from seaweed (Rinaudo 2008).”
BackgroundZaulyanov, L., & Kirsner, R. S. (2007) · Clinical Interventions in Aging · doi:10.2147/ciia.2007.2.1.93 · Cited by 266
Dermal Matrices and Bioengineered Skin Substitutes: A Critical Review of Current Options
Debels, H., Hamdi, M., Abberton, K., & Morrison, W. (2015) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open · doi:10.1097/gox.0000000000000219 · Cited by 227
Cited by
Advanced Hydrogels as Wound Dressings
Tavakoli, S., & Klar, A. S. (2020) · Biomolecules · doi:10.3390/biom10081169 · Cited by 544
Arif, Z. U., Khalid, M. Y., Noroozi, R., Sadeghianmaryan, A., Jalalvand, M., & Hossain, M. (2022) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.07.140 · Cited by 395
Hydrogels and Wound Healing: Current and Future Prospects
Gounden, V., & Singh, M. (2024) · Gels · doi:10.3390/gels10010043 · Cited by 365
Recent trends on wound management: New therapeutic choices based on polymeric carriers
Okur, M. E., Karantas, I. D., Şenyiğit, Z., Üstündağ Okur, N., & Siafaka, P. I. (2020) · Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ajps.2019.11.008 · Cited by 298
Eren Boncu, T., Yücel, Ç., Ceylan, A., Cadir, M., & Sahmetlioglu, E. (2024) · Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy · doi:10.1080/03639045.2024.2426581 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Mir, M., Ali, M. N., Barakullah, A., Gulzar, A., Arshad, M., Fatima, S., & Asad, M.
- Venue
- Progress in Biomaterials
- Published
- 2018-02-14
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-21
- ISSN
- 2194-0509 (ISSN-L)
- 2194-0517
- OpenAlex
- W2793804500
- Cited by
- 525
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 33.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Synthetic polymeric biomaterials for wound healing: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s40204-018-0083-4
- The paper
- Mir, M., Ali, M. N., Barakullah, A., Gulzar, A., Arshad, M., Fatima, S., & Asad, M. (2018). Synthetic polymeric biomaterials for wound healing: a review. Progress in Biomaterials. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40204-018-0083-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.