Cited by 122Probiotics and Fermented FoodsDermatology and Skin DiseasesFood Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research

Probiotic supplementation for prevention of atopic dermatitis in infants and children: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Li, Lin, Han, Zhen, Niu, Xiaoping, Zhang, Guozheng, Jia, Yuliang, Zhang, Shunguo, He, Chiyi·2019·American Journal of Clinical Dermatology

Abstract

Background Probiotic supplementation in early life may be effective in preventing atopic dermatitis (AD); however, results regarding efficacy have been controversial.Objective The aim of our study was to investigate the effect of probiotic supplementation on the risk of AD.Methods We systematically searched PubMed, EBSCO, Embase and Web of Science databases up to 8 March 2018 for potentially relevant studies regarding probiotic supplementation and AD. Included infants and children were those with probiotic exposure in utero and/or after birth who were not previously diagnosed with AD. We calculated the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and used the Jadad and Newcastle-Ottawa scales to assess methodologic quality.Results A total of 28 studies met the inclusion criteria. Compared with controls, probiotic treatment was associated with a reduced risk of AD (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.58-0.82, P < 0.0001). The use of probiotics during both the prenatal and the postnatal period significantly reduced the incidence of AD (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.54-0.82); however, analysis of studies of probiotics given prenatally only or postnatally only did not reach statistical significance.Conclusions Our meta-analysis showed that probiotic supplementation during both the prenatal and the postnatal period reduced the incidence of AD in infants and children. Our findings suggest that starting probiotic treatment during gestation and continuing through the first 6 months of the infant's life may be of benefit in the prevention of AD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40257-018-0404-3

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only some strains of Lactobacillus spp., Bifidobacterium spp., and Propionibacterium spp. showed beneficial results in reducing the risk of atopic eczema in children, while other strains of the same species did not.

    “Following these studies, it was mentioned that only some strains of Lactobacillus spp., Bifidobacterium spp., and Propionibacterium spp. showed beneficial results, while other strains of the same species did not.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, L., Han, Z., Niu, X., Zhang, G., Jia, Y., Zhang, S., & He, C.
Affiliations
Wannan Medical College (CN)
Corresponding author
He, Chiyi
Venue
American Journal of Clinical Dermatology
Published
2018-11-21
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
367-377
ISSN
  • 1175-0561 (ISSN-L)
  • 1179-1888
OpenAlex
W2900930366
Cited by
122
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
Keywords
probiotics, atopic dermatitis, prevention, infants, children, early life
MeSH terms
Infant Health, Clinical Trials as Topic, Dermatitis, Atopic, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Postnatal Care, Pregnancy, Prenatal Care, Incidence, Treatment Outcome, Maternal Exposure, Dietary Supplements, Probiotics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review