Cited by 43Sexuality, Behavior, and TechnologySexual function and dysfunction studiesGambling Behavior and Treatments

Controversies and clinical recommendations for the treatment of compulsive sexual behavior disorder

Griffin, Kaelyn R., Way, Bailey M., Kraus, Shane W.·2021·Current Addiction Reports

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40429-021-00393-5

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Griffin, K. R., Way, B. M., & Kraus, S. W.
Affiliations
University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
Corresponding author
Kraus, Shane W.
Venue
Current Addiction Reports
Published
2021-09-13
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
546-555
ISSN
2196-2952 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3201410723
Cited by
43
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 1
FWCI
4.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Addiction Reports (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
Keywords
compulsive sexual behavior disorder, sexual addiction, compulsive sexual behavior, psychiatric comorbidity, treatment guidelines, underrepresented groups, LGBTQ+ people, older adults, racial and ethnic minorities, religious beliefs, evaluation metrics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review