Cited by 137Sexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyGambling Behavior and TreatmentsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Novelty, conditioning and attentional bias to sexual rewards

Open access
Banca, Paula, Morris, Laurel S., Mitchell, Simon, Harrison, Neil A., Potenza, Marc N., Voon, Valerie·2016·Journal of Psychiatric Research

Abstract

The Internet provides a large source of novel and rewarding stimuli, particularly with respect to sexually explicit materials. Novelty-seeking and cue-conditioning are fundamental processes underlying preference and approach behaviors implicated in disorders of addiction. Here we examine these processes in individuals with compulsive sexual behaviors (CSB), hypothesizing a greater preference for sexual novelty and stimuli conditioned to sexual rewards relative to healthy volunteers. Twenty-two CSB males and forty age-matched male volunteers were tested in two separate behavioral tasks focusing on preferences for novelty and conditioned stimuli. Twenty subjects from each group were also assessed in a third conditioning and extinction task using functional magnetic resonance imaging. CSB was associated with enhanced novelty preference for sexual, as compared to control images, and a generalized preference for cues conditioned to sexual and monetary versus neutral outcomes compared to healthy volunteers. CSB individuals also had greater dorsal cingulate habituation to repeated sexual versus monetary images with the degree of habituation correlating with enhanced preference for sexual novelty. Approach behaviors to sexually conditioned cues dissociable from novelty preference were associated with an early attentional bias to sexual images. This study shows that CSB individuals have a dysfunctional enhanced preference for sexual novelty possibly mediated by greater cingulate habituation along with a generalized enhancement of conditioning to rewards. We further emphasize a dissociable role for cue-conditioning and novelty preference on the early attentional bias for sexual cues. These findings have wider relevance as the Internet provides a broad range of novel and potentially rewarding stimuli.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2015.10.017

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals who report compulsive sexual behaviour, compared to those who do not, exhibit increased blood flow in the reward system of the brain in response to erotic cues, greater responsivity and attention to erotic cues, increased gray matter volume in the left amygdala, and decreased right caudate nucleus volume.

    “Individuals who report compulsive sexual behaviour, as compared to individuals who do not, exhibit increased blood flow in the reward system of the brain in response to erotic cues 268-270 , greater responsivity and attention to erotic cues 271-273 , increased gray matter volume in the left amygdala 274 , and decreased right caudate nucleus volume 275 .”

    From Emerging experience with selected new categories in the <scp>ICD</scp>‐11: complex <scp>PTSD</scp>, prolonged grief disorder, gaming disorder, and compulsive sexual behaviour disorder (2022) · cites this paper as [271]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 64 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Banca, P., Morris, L. S., Mitchell, S., Harrison, N. A., Potenza, M. N., & Voon, V.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Brighton and Sussex Medical School (GB)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Voon, Valerie
Venue
Journal of Psychiatric Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
72
Pages
91-101
ISSN
0022-3956 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2173747897
Cited by
137
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8
FWCI
11.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (WT093705/Z/10/Z, 093875)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
compulsive sexual behavior, novelty seeking, attentional bias, sexual reward, extinction, approach behavior, sexual imagery, addiction
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Brain, Conditioning, Psychological, Cues, Exploratory Behavior, Habituation, Psychophysiologic, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Photic Stimulation, Reward, Sexual Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review