Cited by 57Eating Disorders and BehaviorsImpact of Technology on AdolescentsNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Is problematic internet use an indicator of eating disorders among Turkish university students?

Çelik, Çiğdem Berber, Odacı, Hatice, Bayraktar, Nihal·2015·Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia Bulimia and Obesity

Abstract

Aims The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between problematic internet use and eating attitudes in a group of university students.Methods The study sample consisted of 314 students attending programs at the faculties of education, medicine and communications at the Karadeniz Technical University in Turkey. One hundred forty-seven (46.8 %) were male and 167 (53.2 %) female. The Problematic Internet Use Scale was used to measure problematic internet use levels among university students and the Eating Attitudes Test to determine anorexia nervosa symptoms. Additionally, a Personal Data Form was used to determine age, gender, faculty attended and computer ownership. Data were analyzed on SPSS 15.00. Pearson's product moments correlation coefficient, multiple linear regression analysis, the independent t test and one-way ANOVA were used for data analysis.Results The research findings showed that 46.8 % of students were female and 53.2 % male. Mean age was 20.65 (SD 1.42). Analysis showed a significant positive correlation between problematic internet use and eating attitudes (r = 0.77, p < 0.01). Problematic internet use was found to be a significant predictor of eating attitudes. The results also showed a significant difference in problematic internet use with regard to program variables [F (2,311) = 102.79]. There were no significant differences in problematic internet use in terms of gender or computer ownership.Conclusions The results of this study indicate that problematic internet use is significantly correlated with eating disorders, that problematic internet use does not vary on the basis of gender or computer ownership and that variations arise in problematic internet use depending on the faculty attended.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40519-014-0150-3

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Çelik, Ç. B., Odacı, H., & Bayraktar, N.
Affiliations
Karadeniz Technical University (TR)
Corresponding author
Odacı, Hatice
Venue
Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia Bulimia and Obesity
Published
2014-08-27
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
167-172
ISSN
  • 1124-4909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1590-1262
OpenAlex
W2006184652
Cited by
57
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3
FWCI
4.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia Bulimia and Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
problematic internet use, eating disorders, anorexia nervosa, eating attitudes, university students, Eating Attitudes Test, gender differences, computer ownership, academic program differences
MeSH terms
Anorexia Nervosa, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Attitude, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Students, Turkey, Universities, Behavior, Addictive, Internet, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review