Cited by 113Thyroid Disorders and TreatmentsThyroid and Parathyroid SurgeryAdrenal Hormones and Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 122 of the 122 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 2 of the 76 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Diagnosis and management of treatment-refractory hypothyroidism: an expert consensus report

Open access
Centanni, M., Benvenga, S., Sachmechi, I.·2017·Journal of Endocrinological Investigation

Abstract

There is a frequently encountered subset of hypothyroid patients who are refractory to standard thyroid hormone replacement treatment and require unexpectedly high doses of levothyroxine. In addition to clinical situations where hypothyroid patients are non-compliant, or where there is the possibility of excipient-induced disease exacerbation (gluten/celiac disease), therapeutic failure may be due to impaired absorption of the administered drug. The common approach to managing patients with unusual thyroxine needs is to escalate the dose of levothyroxine until targeted TSH levels are achieved. This approach can increase the risk for prolonged exposure to supratherapeutic doses of levothyroxine, which increase the chances of adverse outcomes. Repeated adjustments of levothyroxine can also escalate the costs of treatment, as frequent office visits and laboratory tests are required to determine and maintain the desired dose. Clinicians should take a systematic approach to managing patients whom they suspect of having treatment-refractory hypothyroidism. This may include searching for, and adjusting, occult medical conditions and/or other factors that may affect the absorption of levothyroxine, before up-titrating the dose of traditional levothyroxine therapy. Depending on the underlying pathology, another approach that may be considered is to try alternative formulations of levothyroxine that are less susceptible to intolerance issues related to excipients, or, in some cases, to malabsorption. The early discovery of these factors via a thoughtful patient work-up may avoid unnecessary thyroid medication adjustments and their consequences for both patients and clinicians.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This expert consensus report reviews treatment-refractory hypothyroidism, defined as biochemical or clinical hypothyroidism despite levothyroxine doses beyond 1.9 μg/kg daily and/or TSH above the upper target, usually 4.5 mU/L after a 6-week interval following the last dose increase. It recommends a systematic eight-step work-up for compliance, absorption, interfering conditions, and alternative levothyroxine formulations before further dose escalation.

Key findings

  • Refractory hypothyroidism is defined by TSH above the upper target (usually 4.5 mU/L after a 6-week interval after the last dosage increase) and/or unresolved hypothyroid symptoms despite levothyroxine doses beyond 1.9 μg/kg daily.
  • Non-optimal thyroxine therapy is common: in five published studies, non-optimal therapy ranged from 32% to 48%; in a Brazilian multicenter study, 28% of 2292 hypothyroid patients had elevated TSH while on thyroid hormone therapy.
  • Causes include non-compliance, generic levothyroxine substitution, GI disease/malabsorption (e.g., *H. pylori*, IBD, celiac disease, lactose intolerance, atrophic body gastritis, gastric bypass), PPIs, pregnancy, weight change, drugs increasing thyroxine turnover, Addison’s disease, and anti-thyroxine antibodies; 10–20% of cases remain idiopathic despite extensive work-up.
  • Alternative formulations may help: in CONTROL Switch (99 patients), switching to levothyroxine gel caps reduced dose adjustments by 55% (P < 0.0001), with >85% experiencing ≤1 dose adjustment post-switch, and improved symptom control by 62% (P < 0.0001); in a liquid-formulation study of 152 patients, TSH declined at first (P < 0.05) and second control (P < 0.01), with FT4 and FT3 unchanged.

Methods

  • Expert consensus report/narrative review; no systematic review, meta-analysis, or primary data collection is described. Evidence is drawn from published literature and the panel’s clinical experience.
  • The paper synthesizes prior studies and proposes an eight-step diagnostic and management approach, including confirming diagnosis, assessing compliance, checking medication bottles/tablets, reviewing ingestion history, investigating malabsorption, considering increased turnover/excretion, performing a thyroxine absorption test when appropriate, and treating holistically.

Limitations

  • The paper states that the prevalence of refractory hypothyroidism has not been precisely documented; the thyroxine absorption test is not standardized and should not be used routinely; and the benefits of combined T4/T3 therapy remain controversial.
  • The paper notes controversy about whether long-term levothyroxine at suppressive or non-suppressive levels increases osteoporosis/fracture risk and calls for comprehensive definitive research.
  • Evident from the text: this is an expert consensus report without a described systematic literature search, formal evidence grading, or prospective validation of the recommended eight-step algorithm.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40618-017-0706-y

Cites

122 of 122 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Figures

Fig. 1 Diagnostic flow chart of thyroxine malabsorption. + if test is positive, − if test is negative. EMA endomysial antibody. (Modified from Centanni M, hotthyroidology.com 2007)
Fig. 1 Diagnostic flow chart of thyroxine malabsorption. + if test is positive, − if test is negative. EMA endomysial antibody. (Modified from Centanni M, hotthyroidology.com 2007)CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

35 Not checked yet · 9 Own interpretation · 1 Supported · 1 Partly supported · 1 No basis given · accuracy not yet measured

Verify all 74 references — free account
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 7
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 9
15 of 15
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The eight-step approach to diagnosing and managing refractory hypothyroidism has been validated through empirical use.

    “We recommend the following eight-step approach, which has been validated through empirical use and should be considered as an alternative to the standard practice of escalating doses of levothyroxine”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Early discovery of factors affecting levothyroxine absorption via a thoughtful patient work-up may avoid unnecessary thyroid medication adjustments and their consequences for patients and clinicians.

    “The early discovery of these factors via a thoughtful patient work-up may avoid unnecessary thyroid medication adjustments and their consequences for both patients and clinicians.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Inter-individual variability in the efficiency of GI absorption is large and accounts for most of the range of dose requirements among compliant patients after adjustment for body size.

    “Inter-individual variability in the efficiency of GI absorption is rather large, and such variability accounts for most of the range of dose requirements seen among compliant patients following adjustment for body size.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The first sign of malabsorption syndrome can be the need for unexpectedly high doses of levothyroxine in replacement therapy; malabsorption syndrome is frequently oligosymptomatic and previously undiagnosed.

    “The first sign of malabsorption syndrome, which is frequently oligosymptomatic and previously undiagnosed, can be the need for unexpectedly high doses of levothyroxine in replacement therapy.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Phenytoin, carbamazepine, and rifampin increase turnover or excretion of thyroid hormone.

    “These medications include phenytoin, carbamazepine, and rifampin.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Switching to generic levothyroxine products is correlated with sub-optimal outcomes.

    “Switching to generic levothyroxine products has also been correlated with sub-optimal outcomes.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The common approach to managing patients with unusual thyroxine needs is to escalate the dose of levothyroxine until targeted TSH levels are achieved.

    “The common approach to managing patients with unusual thyroxine needs is to escalate the dose of levothyroxine until targeted TSH levels are achieved.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A clinical test for estimating the absorption of thyroxine may have utility in some patients who have unexpectedly high thyroxine requirements.

    “Although not standardized, a clinical test for estimating the absorption of thyroxine may have utility in some patients who have unexpectedly high thyroxine requirements.”
8 of 8

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Show all 122 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 113

Metadata

Authors
Centanni, M., Benvenga, S., & Sachmechi, I.
Affiliations
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
  • University of Messina (IT)
  • Queens Hospital Center (US)
Corresponding author
Centanni, M.
Venue
Journal of Endocrinological Investigation
Published
2017-07-10
Volume
40
Issue
12
Pages
1289-1301
ISSN
  • 0391-4097 (ISSN-L)
  • 1720-8386
OpenAlex
W2734775767
Cited by
113
References
122
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 9
FWCI
7.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Endocrinological Investigation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Akrimax Pharmaceuticals, LLC
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
Keywords
levothyroxine, thyroid hormone replacement, drug malabsorption, celiac disease, TSH monitoring, dose escalation, medication adherence
MeSH terms
Drug Resistance, Humans, Hypothyroidism, Disease Management, Hormone Replacement Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-07, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-07 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review