CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 248Artificial Intelligence in EducationEthics and Social Impacts of AIAcademic integrity and plagiarism

ENAI Recommendations on the ethical use of Artificial Intelligence in Education

Open access
Foltynek, Tomas, Bjelobaba, Sonja, Glendinning, Irene, Khan, Zeenath Reza, Santos, Rita, Pavletic, Pegi, Kravjar, Július·2023·International Journal for Educational Integrity
DOI 10.1007/s40979-023-00133-4
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40979-023-00133-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The introduction of unauthorised content generation into higher education contexts poses potential threats to academic integrity.

    “The introduction of unauthorised content generation-'the production of academic work, in whole or part, for academic credit, progression or award, whether or not a payment or other favour is involved, using unapproved or undeclared human or technological assistance' (Foltýnek et al. 2023)-into higher education contexts poses potential threats to academic integrity.”

    From Testing of detection tools for AI-generated text (2023) · cites this paper as Foltýnek et al. 2023

  • The office in a university that deals with complaints stated that most complaints were about the university failing to warn the students about plagiarism and its consequences.

    “The office in a university that deals with complaints stated that most complaints were about the university failing to warn the students about plagiarism and its consequences [142].”

    From Survey on Plagiarism Detection in Large Language Models: The Impact of ChatGPT and Gemini on Academic Integrity (2024) · cites this paper as [142]

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Foltynek, T., Bjelobaba, S., Glendinning, I., Khan, Z. R., Santos, R., Pavletic, P., & Kravjar, J.
Affiliations
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • Coventry University (GB)
  • University of Wollongong in Dubai (AE)
Corresponding author
Bjelobaba, Sonja
ORCID
Venue
International Journal for Educational Integrity
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2023-05-01
Volume
19
Issue
1
ISSN
1833-2595 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1007/s40979-023-00133-4
OpenAlex
W4367626063
Cited by
180
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • International Journal for Educational Integrity (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Uppsala University Publications (Uppsala University) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Pure (Coventry University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
Keywords
artificial intelligence in education, ethical use of AI, ethics in education, responsible AI

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review