Cited by 6Sleep and related disordersCOVID-19 and Mental HealthSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

A longitudinal study on the change in sleep across three waves of the COVID-19 outbreaks in Hong Kong

Open access
Cheung, Denise Shuk Ting, Yu, Branda Yee-Man, Lam, Simon Ching, Leung, Doris Yin Ping, Chung, Ka-Fai, Ho, Fiona Yan-Yee, Chen, Shu-Cheng, Yeung, Wing-Fai·2024·Sleep and Biological Rhythms

Abstract

In the year 2020, Hong Kong experienced four COVID-19 epidemic waves. The present study aimed to examine the transition of sleep disturbances and explore its associated factors across the later three epidemic waves. Among the 1138 respondents who participated in an online survey at the second wave (T1, April 2020), 338 and 378 participants also completed a follow-up at the third (T2, August 2020) and fourth waves (T3, December 2020), respectively. Participants completed the Insomnia Severity Index and an investigator-designed questionnaire regarding potential factors associated with sleep change such as perceived risk of being infected, economic stress, and confidence in the government and health care professional. Sample of this study were mainly female (67.7%), married (50.3%), young adults (54.2%) with tertiary education (81.6%). Maintaining normal sleep was the most prevalent trajectory of sleep of all three waves (50.5%), followed by persistent insomnia (17.2%) and remitted insomnia (9.0%). Besides female, older-age and lower education level, the results showed that increment in worry about family being infected (adjusted risk ratio, RR = 1.28), perceived interference of daily lives (adjusted RR = 1.19), and economic distress (adjusted RR = 1.24) were significantly associated with the development of clinical insomnia during the three epidemic waves. These factors were also associated with worsening of other sleep parameters. Insomnia being persistent across the three waves of COVID-19 outbreaks was common. Increasing economic distress, daily interference, and worry about family members being infected were associated with an increasing risk of clinical insomnia across the three COVID-19 outbreaks. Supplementary information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41105-023-00486-w.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s41105-023-00486-w

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cheung, D. S. T., Yu, B. Y.-M., Lam, S. C., Leung, D. Y. P., Chung, K.-F., Ho, F. Y.-Y., Chen, S.-C., & Yeung, W.-F.
Affiliations
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Yeung, Wing-Fai
Venue
Sleep and Biological Rhythms
Published
2023-09-08
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
93-102
ISSN
  • 1446-9235 (ISSN-L)
  • 1479-8425
OpenAlex
W4386554193
Cited by
6
References
50
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sleep and Biological Rhythms (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
COVID-19 epidemic waves, insomnia, sleep disorders, chronic insomnia, economic hardship, perceived infection risk, Hong Kong

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review