CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 46Relativity and Gravitational TheoryCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 212 of the 212 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Testing theories of gravity with planetary ephemerides

Open access
Fienga, Agnès, Minazzoli, Olivier·2024·Living Reviews in Relativity
DOI 10.1007/s41114-023-00047-0
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Abstract We describe here how planetary ephemerides are built in the framework of General Relativity and how they can be used to test alternative theories. We focus on the definition of the reference frame (space and time) in which the planetary ephemeris is described, the equations of motion that govern the orbits of solar system bodies and electromagnetic waves. After a review on the existing planetary and lunar ephemerides, we summarize the results obtained considering full modifications of the ephemeris framework with direct comparisons with the observations of planetary systems, with a specific attention for the PPN formalism. We then discuss other formalisms such as Einstein-dilaton theories, the massless graviton and MOND. The paper finally concludes on some comments and recommendations regarding misinterpreted measurements of the advance of perihelia.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s41114-023-00047-0

Cites

212 of 212 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Babichev E, Deffayet C (2013) An introduction to the vainshtein mechanism. Class Quantum Grav 30(18):184001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/30/18/184001 · DOI
  2. Barbour J, Pfister H (1995) Mach’s principle: from Newton’s bucket to quantum gravity. EInstein Studies, vol 6. Birkhäuser, Boston
  3. Bergé J, Christophe B, Foulon B, Hardy E, Pernot-Borras M (2018) ISLAND: the inverse square law and Newtonian dynamics space explorer. In: 42nd COSPAR Scientific Assembly, vol 42, pp H0.3–6–18. arXiv:1809.00698 · arXiv
  4. Damour T (1989) The problem of motion in Newtonian and Einsteinian gravity. In: Hawking SW, Israel W (eds) Three hundred years of gravitation. Cambridge University Press, pp 128–198
  5. Donivan FF, Newhall XX (1981) Delta VLBI observations of Mars Viking Lander I. Bull Am Astron Soc 13:555
  6. Einstein A (1915) Zur allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie. Sitzungsber Königl Preuss Akad Wiss Berlin 1915:778–786
  7. Fienga A, Bernus L, Minazzoli O, Hees A, Bigot L, Herrera C, Herrera C, Mariani V, Di Ruscio A, Mary D (2022) INPOP Planetary ephemerides and applications in the frame of the BepiColombo mission including new constraints on the graviton mass and dilaton parameters. In: Auge E, Dumarchez J, Tran Thanh Van J (eds) Proceedings, 56nd Rencontres de Moriond on Gravitation: La Thuile, Italy, January 30–February 6, 2022, ARISF. arxiv:2211.04881 · arXiv
  8. Fienga A, Bigot L, Mary D, Deram P, Di Ruscio A, Bernus L, Gastineau M, Laskar J (2021a) Evolution of INPOP planetary ephemerides and Bepi-Colombo simulations. In: Celletti A et al (eds) Multi-scale (time and mass) dynamics of space objects. IAU Symposium, vol 364. Cambridge University Press, pp 31–51
  9. Fienga A, Laskar J, Manche H, Kuchynka P, Desvignes G, Gastineau M, Cognard I, Thereau G (2011b) The planetary ephemerides INPOP10a and its applications in fundamental physics. Celest Mech Dyn Astron 111:363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-011-9377-8 · DOI
  10. Folkner WM, Charlot P, Finger MH, Williams JG, Sovers OJ, Newhall X, Standish EM Jr (1994) Determination of the extragalactic-planetary frame tie from joint analysis of radio interferometric and lunar laser ranging measurements. Astron Astrophys 287:279–289
  11. Gaillot AM, Le Verrier UJ (1913) Addition a la théorie du mouvement de Jupiter de Le Verrier: tables rectifiées du mouvement de Jupiter. Ann l’Observ Paris 31:1
  12. Jones D, Folkner W, Park R, Jacobs C, Romney J, Dhawan V (2019) Constraining Jupiter’s orbit with VLBA astrometry of Juno. In: American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, vol 233, p 302.01
  13. Klioner SA (2016) Parametrized post-Newtonian equations of motion of N mass monopoles with the SEP violation. arXiv e-prints arXiv:1607.00183 · arXiv
  14. Lorentz HA, Droste J, Versl K (1917a) De beweging van een stelsel lichamen onder den invloed van hunne onderlinge aantrekking, behandeld volgens de theorie van Einstein. I. Akad Wet Amsterdam 26:392
  15. Lorentz HA, Droste J, Versl K (1917b) De beweging van een stelsel lichamen onder den invloed van hunne onderlinge aantrekking, behandeld volgens de theorie van Einstein. II. Akad Wet Amsterdam 26:649
  16. Manche H (2011) Modele dynamique des ephemerides inpop et ajustement aux donnees LLR. PhD thesis, Observatoire de Paris. https://www.imcce.fr/content/medias/publications/publications-recherche/theses-habilitations/docs/Manche_These.pdf
  17. Moyer T (2000) Formulation for observed and computed values of deep space network data types for navigation. Monography of deep space communications and navigation series, vol 2. JPL, Pasadena
  18. Newhall XX, Standish JEM, Williams JG (1983) DE 102: a numerically integrated ephemeris of the moon and planets spanning forty-four centuries. Astron Astrophys 125(1):150–167
  19. Petit G, Luzum B (2010) IERS conventions (2010). IERS Tech Note 36:1
  20. Pitjeva EV, Pitjev NP (2013) Relativistic effects and dark matter in the Solar system from observations of planets and spacecraft. Mon Not R Astron Soc 432:3431–3437. https://doi.org/10.1093/Mon.Not.R.Astron.Soc./stt695. arXiv:1306.3043 · DOI
  21. Standish JEM (2001) The JPL DE405 planetary and lunar ephemerides. JPL, Pasadena
  22. Standish JEM (1990) The observational basis for JPL’s DE 200, the planetary ephemerides of the astronomical almanac. Astron Astrophys 233:252–271

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 46

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Fienga, A., & Minazzoli, O.
Affiliations
  • Observatoire de Paris (FR)
  • Astrophysique Relativiste, Théories, Expériences, Métrologie, Instrumentation, Signaux (FR)
Corresponding author
Fienga, Agnès
ORCID
Venue
Living Reviews in Relativity
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2024-01-29
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
1
ISSN
1433-8351 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1007/s41114-023-00047-0
OpenAlex
W4391322514
Cited by
45
References
212
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15
FWCI
8.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Living Reviews in Relativity (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Keywords
planetary ephemerides, modified gravity, general relativity, perihelion precession, PPN formalism, lunar ephemeris, massless graviton, MOND, solar system tests of gravity, reference frames, equations of motion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review