Cited by 5Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersNeuroendocrine regulation and behavior

Current Status of Psychopharmacological, Neuromodulation, and Oxytocin Treatments for Autism: Implications for Clinical Practice

Open access
Bitsika, Vicki, Sharpley, Christopher F.·2024·Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Abstract

Abstract Objectives To provide an overview of the current literature regarding the neurobiological treatments of psychopharmacology, neuromodulation, oxytocin therapy, and psychological resilience, as treatments for autism-related difficulties, and to distil the research findings from those treatments for everyday clinical application. Methods Instead of producing another specific systematic summary of the efficacy of these treatments, this review took an overview of each field of research, identified its key research findings, and evaluated the treatment-ready status of each of them in terms of their evidence base. From this information, a set of recommendations were derived for their clinical applications, so as to inform practice in the field. Results These treatments represent relatively recent and neurobiologically based approaches to the challenges of autism, and are in the development stage. Each treatment is promising, and has some evidential basis for its success, but all need further research to establish their evidence-based validity for everyday clinical usage. Conclusions While most of these treatments can be applied with caution, clinicians should acknowledge their restrictive benefits and costs, that are described herein. Within those caveats, each of these treatments should be considered as an emerging therapy that clinicians should consider utilising in appropriate settings and with specific cases.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s41252-023-00364-z

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Riordan et al. is included as a normal part of the scientific literature in articles contributing to meta-analyses and reviews or aiding interpretation of newly reported data.

    “Instead, this retracted article is included as a normal part of the scientific literature in these articles, contributing to metaanalyses and reviews of the current state of stem cell science19,20 or aiding the interpretation of newly reported data.21,22”

    From Why retracted articles can have an influential afterlife—and what to do about it (2026) · cites this paper as [20]

    The References section lists Riordan et al. (2019) without a retraction warning, supporting the narrower point that this review includes it as a literature reference. The Method section describes this paper as an overview for clinicians, not a meta-analysis; our copy does not show Riordan contributing to a stem-cell meta-analysis or aiding interpretation of newly reported data, and it does not establish the article’s retraction status. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Aman, M., Singh, N., Stewart, A., & Field, C. (1985). The aberrant behavior checklist: A behavior ratings scale for the assessment of treatment effects. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 89, 485-491.
  2. Constantino, J., & Gruber, C. (2012). Social Responsiveness Scale sec- ond edition (SRS-2). Western Psychological Services.
  3. Herrman, H., Stewart, D. E., Diaz-Granados, N., Berger, E. L., Jack- son, B., & Yuen, T. (2011). What is resilience? The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 56(5), 258-265. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 07067 43711 056005 · DOI
  4. John, S., & Jaeggi, A. V. (2021). Oxytocin levels tend to be lower in autistic children: A meta-analysis of 31 studies. Autism, 25(8), 2152-2161. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1177/ 13623 61321 1034 · DOI
  5. Murphy, E. (2023). ROSE: A neurocomputational architecture for syn- tax. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2303. 08877. https:// www. ncbi. nlm. nih. gov/ pubmed/ 36994 166

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bitsika, V., & Sharpley, C. F.
Affiliations
University of New England (AU)
Corresponding author
Sharpley, Christopher F.
Venue
Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Published
2023-09-26
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
355-364
ISSN
  • 2366-7532 (ISSN-L)
  • 2366-7540
OpenAlex
W4387004001
Cited by
5
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2
FWCI
0.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RUNE (Research UNE) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
University of New England
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, psychopharmacology, neuromodulation, oxytocin therapy, psychological resilience, treatment readiness, clinical guidelines, evidence base, new drugs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review