Cited by 39Circadian rhythm and melatoninMenstrual Health and DisordersOvarian function and disorders

Neuroendocrine effects of light therapy in late luteal phase dysphoric disorder

Parry, Barbara L., Hauger, Richard, Lin, Emily, LeVeau, Betina, Mostofi, Nasim, Clopton, Paul L., Gillin, J.C.·1994·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

In 20 late luteal phase dysphoric disorder (LLPDD) and in 11 normal control (NC) subjects, circadian profiles of cortisol, prolactin, thyrotropin-stimulating hormone (TSH), and core body temperature were measured during midfollicular (MF) and late luteal (LL) menstrual cycle phases and after 1 week of light therapy either with (1) bright (tau 2500 lux) white morning (6:30 AM to 8:30 AM), (2) bright white evening (7 PM to 9 PM) or (3) dim (< 10 lux) red evening light, randomly administered in three separate luteal phases. In NC but not PMDD subjects, the cortisol peak significantly delayed in the LL compared with the MF phase. In PMDD, prolactin peak and amplitude were higher, prolactin acrophase earlier, and temperature amplitude higher during both the MF and LL phases. After light treatment, prolactin amplitude remained higher in LLPDD than in controls. In both groups, bright light shifted the cortisol acrophase, and AM light increased the prolactin nadir. Bright PM light increased the TSH nadir in LLPDD, but decreased it in controls. Thus, menstrual cycle phase, diagnosis, and light therapy may differentially affect neuroendocrine systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0006-3223(94)91210-6

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parry, B. L., Hauger, R., Lin, E., LeVeau, B., Mostofi, N., Clopton, P. L., & Gillin, J. C.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Parry, Barbara L.
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-09
Volume
36
Issue
6
Pages
356-364
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2099299350
Cited by
39
References
43
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH30914-14, R29MH4283)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M-01RR00827, M01RR000827)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
Keywords
phototherapy, late luteal phase dysphoric disorder, premenstrual dysphoric disorder, neuroendocrine effects, cortisol, prolactin, core body temperature, circadian rhythm, menstrual cycle phases, bright light exposure
MeSH terms
Arousal, Body Temperature Regulation, Circadian Rhythm, Female, Hormones, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Luteal Phase, Middle Aged, Neurosecretory Systems, Personality Assessment, Phototherapy, Premenstrual Syndrome, Prolactin, Thyrotropin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review