Cited by 395Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

A direct comparison of amphetamine-induced behaviours and regional brain dopamine release in the rat using intracerebral dialysis

Sharp, T., Zetterström, T., Ljungberg, T., Ungerstedt, U.·1987·Brain Research

Abstract

An intracerebral microdialysis method was used in awake rats to directly compare the effect of amphetamine on dopamine (DA) release in the striatum and nucleus (n.) accumbens with alterations in behaviour. Amphetamine (0.5-5.0 mg/kg, s.c.) caused a dose-dependent release of DA in both brain regions; however the n. accumbens appeared for the most part more sensitive to amphetamine than the striatum. At each individual dose of the drug, 0.5, 2.0 and 5.0 mg/kg s.c., DA release was closely followed over the time course by the overall behavioural syndrome. Certain components of behaviour showed a regional-specific association with DA release. The intensity of stereotyped head and forepaw movements was closely correlated over the dose range with the amount of DA released in striatum but not n. accumbens. Over the time course, however, the occurrence of this behaviour was delayed compared to increased striatal DA release. In contrast, increased locomotor activity was correlated with the time course change in, and amount of, DA released in n. accumbens by low doses of amphetamine, but not at any dose with DA released in striatum. Repetitive sniffing was better correlated with DA released in n. accumbens than striatum. These in vivo measurements of DA release add further support to the hypothesis that amphetamine-induced stereotypy and locomotion are mediated via DA released in striatum and n. accumbens, respectively. Our data suggest that the occurrence of intense stereotypy rather than locomotor activity at high doses of amphetamine is not due to a selection action in striatum but probably competition between the two behaviours.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0006-8993(87)91416-8

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sharp, T., Zetterström, T., Ljungberg, T., & Ungerstedt, U.
Affiliations
Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Corresponding author
Sharp, T.
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1987-01
Volume
401
Issue
2
Pages
322-330
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2016755990
Cited by
395
References
25
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
amphetamine, dopamine release, striatum, nucleus accumbens, locomotor activity, dose-dependent effects, intracerebral microdialysis
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Corpus Striatum, Dextroamphetamine, Dopamine, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Male, Motor Activity, Nucleus Accumbens, Rats, Inbred Strains, Septal Nuclei, Stereotyped Behavior, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review