Cited by 107Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated ReceptorsCholesterol and Lipid MetabolismRetinoids in leukemia and cellular processes

Induction of the peroxisome proliferator activated receptor by fenofibrate in rat liver

Open access
Gebel, Thomas, Arand, Michael, Oesch, Franz·1992·FEBS Letters

Abstract

The process of peroxisome proliferation in rodent liver by hypolipidemic compounds and related substances has recently been shown to be receptor‐madiated. In the present study, we have examined the effect of oral administration of the strong peroxisome proliferator fenofibrate on the hepatic expression level of the peroxisome proliferator activated receptor (PPAR) in rats. Immunoblots of rat liver cytosols and nuclear extracs using antibodies raised against recombinant PPAR/β‐galactosidase fusion proteins revealed a pronounced increase in the amount of PPAR protein in response to fenofibrate treatment. This induction could also be confirmed at the level or RNA by Northern blotting. A time‐course investigation showed a delayed accumulation of mRNA in response to the treatment, starting on day 2 after a latency period of at least one day. Thus, induction of the PPAR as a response to peroxisome proliferators represents one important dimension of the pleiotropic effects of peroxisome proliferators.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0014-5793(92)80734-x

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fenofibrate's basic mechanism of action involves PPAR-α agonist activity resulting in altered transcription of several genes.

    “Although FF’s basic mechanism of action is known to involve PPAR-α agonist activity resulting in altered transcription of several genes, the actual genetic bases for variability in lipid response is poorly understood.”

    From Fenofibrate and metabolic syndrome (2010) · cites this paper as [17]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gebel, T., Arand, M., & Oesch, F.
Affiliations
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
Corresponding author
Arand, Michael
Venue
FEBS Letters
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1992-08-31
Volume
309
Issue
1
Pages
37-40
ISSN
  • 0014-5793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1873-3468
OpenAlex
W2094123336
Cited by
106
References
19
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • FEBS Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes
Keywords
peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors, fenofibrate, peroxisome proliferation, lipid-lowering drugs, pleiotropy, rat liver
MeSH terms
Animals, Base Sequence, Cell Nucleus, Cytosol, Immune Sera, Male, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Microbodies, Molecular Sequence Data, Oligodeoxyribonucleotides, Fenofibrate, Receptors, Cell Surface, Transcription Factors, Blotting, Northern, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Receptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review