CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 35Agricultural Engineering and MechanizationRuminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAgricultural economics and policies

Optimization of plastic covers for stack silos

Savoie, P.·1988·Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research
DOI 10.1016/0021-8634(88)90189-8
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0021-8634(88)90189-8

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several factors affect silage DM and nutritional losses during conservation and feed-out, such as the daily feed-out rate, the use of silage additives and the fermentation profile, the method of sealing and type of plastic sealing, DM content at ensiling, particle size, filling rate, and the packed density of silage in the silo.

    “Several factors affect silage DM and nutritional losses during conservation and feed-out, such as the daily feed-out rate (Mahanna and Chase, 2003), the use of silage additives and the fermentation profile (Weinberg and Muck, 1996), the method of sealing and type of plastic sealing (Savoie, 1988; Borreani et al., 2007), DM content at ensiling, particle size, filling rate, and the packed density of”

    From Silage review: Factors affecting dry matter and quality losses in silages (2018) · cites this paper as Savoie, 1988

  • Savoie (1988) reported DM losses due to LDPE film permeability decreased from 24.4 to 3.2 g/kg of DM per 30-d storage period as film thickness increased from 25 to 200 μm.

    “Savoie (1988) calculated DM losses due to LDPE film permeability in relation to film thickness, and reported losses of 24.4 to 3.2 g/kg of DM per 30-d storage period as film thickness increased from 25 to 200 μm.”

    From Silage review: Factors affecting dry matter and quality losses in silages (2018) · cites this paper as Savoie (1988)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Savoie, P.
Affiliations
Université Laval (CA)
Corresponding author
Savoie, P.
Venue
Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1988-10
Volume
41
Issue
2
Pages
65-73
ISSN
0021-8634 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/0021-8634(88)90189-8
OpenAlex
W1979547653
Cited by
35
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Agricultural Engineering and Mechanization
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Agricultural economics and policies
Keywords
air leakage, silage preservation, film permeability, cost optimization, round bale silage, storage time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review