Cited by 88Bone health and osteoporosis researchBone fractures and treatmentsElasticity and Material Modeling

Compressive creep behavior of bovine trabecular bone

Bowman, Steven M., Keaveny, Tony M., Gibson, Lorna J., Hayes, Wilson C., McMahon, Thomas A.·1994·Journal of Biomechanics

Abstract

There are almost no published data that describe the creep behavior of trabecular bone (at the specimen level), even though the creep behavior of cortical bone has been well documented. In an effort to characterize the creep behavior of trabecular bone and to compare it with that of cortical bone, we performed uniaxial compressive creep tests on 24 cylindrical specimens of trabecular bone taken from 19 bovine proximal tibiae. Six different load levels were used, with the applied stress normalized by the specimen modulus measured prior to creep loading. We found that trabecular bone exhibits the three creep regimens (primary, secondary, and tertiary) associated with metals, ceramics, and cortical bone. All specimens eventually fractured at strains less than 3.8%. In addition, the general shape of the creep curve was independent of apparent density. Strong and highly significant power law relationships (r2 > 0.82, p < 0.001) were found between the normalized stress sigma/E0 and both time-to-failure tf and steady-state creep rate d epsilon/dt: tf = 9.66 x 10(-33) (sigma/E0)-16.18; d epsilon/dt = 2.21 x 10(33) (sigma/E0)17.65. These data indicate that the creep behaviors of trabecular and cortical bone are qualitatively similar. In addition, the strength of trabecular bone can be reduced substantially if relatively large stresses (i.e. stresses approximately half the ultimate strength) are applied for 5 h. Such strength reductions may play a role in the etiology of progressive, age-related spine fractures if adaptive bone remodeling does not arrest creep deformations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0021-9290(94)90006-x

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Trabecular bone exhibits an initial rapid increase in strain followed by a steady-state regime with a constant creep rate and, finally, another rapid increase in strain just prior to creep fracture.

    “Trabecular bone has similar creep characteristics as cortical bone and exhibits an initial rapid increase in strain followed by a steady-state regime with a constant creep rate and, finally, another rapid increase in strain just prior to creep fracture (103).”

    From Bone Mechanical Properties in Healthy and Diseased States (2018) · cites this paper as [103]

  • Trabecular bone has similar creep characteristics as cortical bone.

    “Trabecular bone has similar creep characteristics as cortical bone and exhibits an initial rapid increase in strain followed by a steady-state regime with a constant creep rate and, finally, another rapid increase in strain just prior to creep fracture (103).”

    From Bone Mechanical Properties in Healthy and Diseased States (2018) · cites this paper as [103]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bowman, S. M., Keaveny, T. M., Gibson, L. J., Hayes, W. C., & McMahon, T. A.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Bowman, Steven M.
Venue
Journal of Biomechanics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-03
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
301-310
ISSN
0021-9290 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2080805462
Cited by
88
References
36
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Biomechanics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (AR41481)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Bone fractures and treatments
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Elasticity and Material Modeling
Keywords
trabecular bone, compressive creep, bovine bone, cortical bone, time to failure, steady-state creep rate, power-law relationship, apparent density, proximal tibia, bone remodeling
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Biomechanical Phenomena, Bone and Bones, Cattle, Models, Biological, Reference Values, Stress, Mechanical, Linear Models, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review