Cited by 322Coffee research and impactsNutritional Studies and DietAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects

Coffee, caffeine, and cardiovascular disease in men.

Open access
Grobbee, Diederick E., Rimm, Eric B., Giovannucci, Edward, Colditz, Graham, Stampfer, Meir, Willett, Walter·1990·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For many years, an association between coffee consumption and the risk of coronary heart disease has been suspected. Although based on small numbers of end points, a prospective study has suggested a particularly strong association between recent coffee drinking and the incidence of cardiovascular disease. METHODS: We examined prospectively the relation of coffee consumption with the risk of myocardial infarction, need for coronary-artery bypass grafting or angioplasty, and risk of stroke in a cohort of 45,589 U.S. men who were 40 to 75 years old in 1986 and who had no history of cardiovascular disease. RESULTS: During two years of follow-up observation, 221 participants had a nonfatal myocardial infarction or died of coronary heart disease, 136 underwent coronary-artery surgery or angioplasty, and 54 had a stroke. Total coffee consumption was not associated with an increased risk of coronary heart disease or stroke. The age-adjusted relative risk for all cardiovascular disease among participants who drank four or more cups of coffee per day was 1.04 (95 percent confidence intervals, 0.74 to 1.46). Increasing levels of consumption of caffeinated coffee were not associated with higher risks of cardiovascular disease. Higher consumption of decaffeinated coffee, however, was associated with a marginally significant increase in the risk of coronary heart disease (relative risk, 1.63; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.02 to 2.60). Finally, we observed no pattern of increased risk across the subgroups of participants with increasing intakes of caffeine from all sources. Adjustment for major cardiovascular-risk indicators, dietary intake of fats, and cholesterol intake did not materially alter these associations. CONCLUSIONS: These findings do not support the hypothesis that coffee or caffeine consumption increases the risk of coronary heart disease or stroke.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm199010113231504

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Grobbee et al. (1990), risk of CHD, CABG, PTCA, stroke or total CVD did not increase significantly across categories of caffeinated or decaffeinated coffee consumption or total caffeine intake, except for a significant p trend (0.04) for increased risk of CABG and PTCA in the highest category of decaffeinated coffee consumption.

    “The risk of CHD (total, non-fatal MI and fatal CHD), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), stroke or total CVD did not increase significantly across categories of caffeinated or decaffeinated coffee consumption (one or less cup, two to three cups and four or more cups per day compared with none) or of total caffeine intake (quintiles: 0-”

    From Scientific Opinion on the safety of caffeine (2015) · cites this paper as Grobbee et al., 1990

  • One study found that total coffee consumption was not associated with an increased stroke risk in men.

    “One study found that total coffee consumption was not associated with an increased stroke risk in men 23”
  • There have been discrepant findings on the association between habitual coffee intake and ischemic stroke.

    “There have been discrepant findings on the association between habitual coffee intake and ischemic stroke.”
  • Grobbee et al found no association between coffee intake and risk of heart disease, even though the mean lag time between exposure assessment and outcome was less than two years.

    “Grobbee et al however, found no association between coffee intake and risk of heart disease, even though the mean lag time between exposure assessment and outcome was less than two years.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [2]2. Coffee drinking and acute myocardial infarction: report from the Boston Collaborative Drug Surveillance Program. Lancet 1972; 2:1278-81.
  2. [4]4. Klatsky AL, Friedman GD, Siegelaub AB. Coffee drinking prior to myocardl i - ie oe r oit Myocardial Infarction. JAMA 1973; 226:540-3.
  3. [15]15. Jacobsen BK, Bjelke E, Kvale G, Heuch I. Coffee drinking, mortality, and cancer incidence: results from a Norwegian prospective study. J Natl Cancer Inst 1986; 76:823-31.
  4. [16]16. Yano K, Reed DM, MacLean CJ. Coffee consumption and the incidence of coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med 1987; 316:946.
  5. [24]24. Sawicki P, Berger M. Coffee consumption and the incidence of coronary heart disease. N Engl J Med 1987; 316:946.
  6. [26]26. Rotenberg FA, DeFeo JJ. The effects of caffeine on cardiac irritability. Fed Proc 1976; 35:384. abstract.
  7. [31]31. Bak AAA, Grobbee DE. Effects of caffeine on blood pressure and serum lipids: results from a double blind study. Am J Clin Nutr (in press).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grobbee, D. E., Rimm, E. B., Giovannucci, E., Colditz, G., Stampfer, M., & Willett, W.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
1990-10-11
Volume
323
Issue
15
Pages
1026-1032
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2320037517
Cited by
322
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
FWCI
17.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL035464, HL35464)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Keywords
coffee consumption, caffeine, cardiovascular disease, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary artery bypass grafting, angioplasty, decaffeinated coffee, men
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Caffeine, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cerebrovascular Disorders, Coffee, Coronary Disease, Feeding Behavior, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Tea

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review