Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 216

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Structural models for the mediation of salience effects on attribution

Fiske, Susan T., Kenny, David A., Taylor, Shelley E.·1982·Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
DOI 10.1016/0022-1031(82)90046-4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0022-1031(82)90046-4

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Bentler, 1980, Multivariate analysis with latent variables: Causal modeling, Vol. 31
  2. Bentler, 1979, Simple mini-theories of love, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 124, 10.1037/0022-3514.37.1.124 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.1.124
  3. Bentler, 1979, An evaluation of models of attitude-behavior relations, Psychological Review, 86, 452, 10.1037/0033-295X.86.5.452 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Bogazzi, 1979, Attitude organization and the attitude-behavior relationship, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 913, 10.1037/0022-3514.37.6.913 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Costner, 1971, Utilizing causal models to discover flaws in experiments, Sociometry, 34, 398, 10.2307/2786206 · DOI
  6. Duval, 1977, Extensions of objective self-awareness theory: The focus of attention-causal attribution hypothesis, Vol. 1
  7. Fiske, 1980, Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of extreme and negative behavior, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 889, 10.1037/0022-3514.38.6.889 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.38.6.889 · Paper page
  8. Fiske, 1980, What does the schema concept buy us?, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 543, 10.1177/014616728064006 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Hastie, 1981, Schematic principles in human memory, Vol. 1
  10. Jackson, 1980, Maximum-likelihood estimation in common factor analysis: A cautionary note, Psychological Bulletin, 88, 502, 10.1037/0033-2909.88.2.502 · DOI
  11. Kahneman, 1972, Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness, Cognitive Psychology, 3, 430, 10.1016/0010-0285(72)90016-3 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Kenny, D. A. Quantitative methods of special interest to social psychologists. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, in press.
  13. McArthur, 1980, Illusory causation and illusory correlation: Two epistemological accounts, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 507, 10.1177/014616728064003 · DOI
  14. McArthur, 1981, What grabs you? The role of attention in impression formation and causal attribution, Vol. 1
  15. McArthur, L. Z., & Ginsberg, E. Visual attention to people with a salient physical attribute. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, in press.
  16. McArthur, 1977, Figural emphasis and person perception, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 520, 10.1016/0022-1031(77)90051-8 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Moreland, 1979, Exposure effects may not depend on stimulus recognition, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1085, 10.1037/0022-3514.37.6.1085 · DOI
  18. Romer, 1979, Internalization versus identification in the laboratory: A causal analysis of attitude change, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2171, 10.1037/0022-3514.37.12.2171 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.12.2171
  19. Ross, 1977, The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process, Vol. 10
  20. Smith, 1979, Salience and the cognitive mediation of attribution, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2240, 10.1037/0022-3514.37.12.2240 · DOI
  21. Snyder, 1979, Testing hypotheses about other people: The use of historical knowledge, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15, 330, 10.1016/0022-1031(79)90042-8 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Storms, 1973, Videotape and the attribution process: Reversing actors' and observers' point of view, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 165, 10.1037/h0034782 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Taylor, 1981, Schematic bases of social information processing, Vol. 1
  24. Taylor, 1979, The generalizability of salience effects, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 357, 10.1037/0022-3514.37.3.357 · DOI
  25. Taylor, S.E. Fiske, S.T.Getting inside the head: Methodogies for process analysis. In J., Harvey, W., Ickes, & R., Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. III). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum, in press
  26. Taylor, 1975, Point-of-view and perceptions of causality, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 439, 10.1037/h0077095 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Taylor, 1978, Salience, attention, and attributions: Top of the head phenomena, Vol. 11
  28. Wicklund, 1975, Objective self-awareness, Vol. 8

Cited by

See all 216

Metadata

Authors
Fiske, S. T., Kenny, D. A., & Taylor, S. E.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1982-03
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
105-127
ISSN
0022-1031 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/0022-1031(82)90046-4
OpenAlex
W2143291771
Cited by
216
References
3
FWCI
39.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structural models for the mediation of salience effects on attribution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0022-1031(82)90046-4
The paper
Fiske, S. T., Kenny, D. A., & Taylor, S. E. (1982). Structural models for the mediation of salience effects on attribution. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(82)90046-4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.