CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 17Regulation of Appetite and ObesityNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorBiochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques

Acquisition of dietary self-selection in rats with normal and impaired oral sensation

Miller, Maria G., Teates, Joseph F.·1985·Physiology & Behavior
DOI 10.1016/0031-9384(85)90203-3
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

To study the mechanisms of dietary self-selection, the dietary choice behavior of rats was observed for up to 5 weeks, beginning on the first day of exposure to two nutritionally different diets, a high-protein diet (44% protein) and a protein-free carbohydrate diet. In Experiment 1 normal rats selected equal amounts of the two selection diets at first and over a 7-day period gradually modified the choice ratio until a stable protein intake of 14.6% (SE,0.4) of total intake was reached. In Experiment 2 rats were subjected to partial trigeminal deafferentation, which impairs oral somatosensory input (touch, temperature, pain), before the two selection diets were introduced. The deafferented animals did not develop a stable selection pattern; their protein ratio varied over the entire possible range (0-44%) throughout the experiment. It is hypothesized that quantitative protein/carbohydrate selection involves an associative learning process in which somatosensory inputs from the feeding activity and/or from the properties of the food link dietary choice behavior to later metabolic consequences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0031-9384(85)90203-3

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When given a choice, a wide range of species will self-select between diets that are high and low in protein in order to maintain protein intake.

    “When given a choice, a wide range of species will self-select between diets that are high and low in protein in order to maintain protein intake”

    From FGF21 and the physiological regulation of macronutrient preference (2020) · cites this paper as [88]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Miller, M. G., & Teates, J. F.
Affiliations
United States Food and Drug Administration (US)
Corresponding author
Miller, Maria G.
Venue
Physiology & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1985-03
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
401-408
ISSN
0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/0031-9384(85)90203-3
OpenAlex
W2078629868
Cited by
17
References
38
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
Keywords
dietary self-selection, food choice behavior, high-protein diet, protein intake, associative learning, rats
MeSH terms
Animals, Body Weight, Energy Intake, Choice Behavior, Diet, Dietary Proteins, Feeding Behavior, Food Preferences, Male, Mouth Mucosa, Rats, Inbred Strains, Sensation, Trigeminal Nerve, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review