Cited by 95Art Therapy and Mental HealthInnovative Human-Technology InteractionDigital Media and Visual Art

DeepThInk: Designing and probing human-AI co-creation in digital art therapy

Du, Xuejun, An, Pengcheng, Leung, Justin, Li, April, Chapman, Linda E., Zhao, Jian·2024·International Journal of Human-Computer Studies

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103139

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 83 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Du, X., An, P., Leung, J., Li, A., Chapman, L. E., & Zhao, J.
Affiliations
University of Waterloo (CA)
Corresponding author
Zhao, Jian
Venue
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-01
Volume
181
Pages
103139
ISSN
1071-5819 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386282985
Cited by
95
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 24
FWCI
160.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (publishedVersion)
  • UWSpace (University of Waterloo) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Art Therapy and Mental Health
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Digital Media and Visual Art
Keywords
digital art therapy, human-AI co-creation, art therapy, creativity support, expressivity, design principles, user evaluation, expert review

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review