CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 122Child Abuse and TraumaChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentChild Welfare and Adoption

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Empathic responsiveness and affective reactivity to infant stimuli in high- and low-risk for physical child abuse mothers

Milner, Joel S., Halsey, Lea B., Fultz, Jim·1995·Child Abuse & Neglect
DOI 10.1016/0145-2134(95)00035-7
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Empathic responsiveness and affective reactivity to infant stimuli were examined in matched groups of high- and low-risk for physical child abuse mothers. Hypotheses were generated based on models of aggression and the child abuse literature. Although no between-group differences were found in empathy, within-group differences were observed. Compared to baseline, high-risk mothers reported no change (p > .05) in empathy across infant conditions (baseline, smiling, quiet, and crying), while low-risk mothers reported an increase (p < .0005) in empathy following presentation of the crying infant. Although there was no change in empathy, high-risk mothers reported more sadness, distress, hostility, unhappiness, and less quietness following presentation of the crying infant. Low-risk mothers reported no changes in sadness, distress, and hostility. The data for high-risk mothers are congruent with reports that physical child abusers are less empathic and more hostile in response to a crying child. The findings support aggression models which suggest the lack of empathy and the presence of negative affectivity precede abusive behavior. Post-hoc analyses also provide support for an emotional contagion perspective, where high-risk parents, compared to low-risk parents, are thought to more frequently reflect the emotional state of the infant.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0145-2134(95)00035-7

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Pruitt, 1983, A predictive model of child abuse: A preliminary investigation (Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Commonwealth University), Dissertation Abstracts International, 44, 3206B
  2. Steele, B. (1998). Psychodynamic factors in child abuse. In C. Kempe, & R. Helfer (Eds.), The battered child (pp. 49–85). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 122

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Milner, J. S., Halsey, L. B., & Fultz, J.
Affiliations
Northern Illinois University (US)
Corresponding author
Milner, Joel S.
ORCID
Milner, Joel S.
Venue
Child Abuse & Neglect
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-06
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
767-780
ISSN
0145-2134 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/0145-2134(95)00035-7
OpenAlex
W2039105550
Cited by
122
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Child Abuse & Neglect (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Child Welfare and Adoption
Keywords
child physical abuse, maternal empathy, emotional reactivity, infant crying, maternal hostility, negative affectivity, aggression models, emotional contagion, maternal emotions, high-risk mothers, child maltreatment risk, mother-infant interaction
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Child, Child Abuse, Child, Preschool, Empathy, Female, Humans, Infant, Mother-Child Relations, Personality Inventory, Risk Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review