Cited by 1,259Patient Satisfaction in HealthcareSurvey Methodology and NonresponseHealthcare Quality and Management

Defining and measuring patient satisfaction with medical care

Ware, John E., Snyder, Mary K., Wright, W.Russell, Davies, Allyson R.·1983·Evaluation and Program Planning

Abstract

This paper describes the development of Form II of the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ), a self-administered survey instrument designed for use in general population studies. The PSQ contains 55 Likert-type items that measure attitudes toward the more salient characteristics of doctors and medical care services (technical and interpersonal skills of providers, waiting time for appointments, office waits, emergency care, costs of care, insurance coverage, availability of hospitals, and other resources) and satisfaction with care in general. Scales are balanced to control for acquiescent response set. Scoring rules for 18 multi-item subscales and eight global scales were standardized following replication of item analyses in four field tests. Internal-consistency and test-retest estimates indicate satisfactory reliability for studies involving group comparisons. The PSQ well represents the content of characteristics of providers and services described most often in the literature and in response to open-ended questions. Empirical tests of validity have also produced generally favorable results.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0149-7189(83)90005-8

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire III was adapted for this study because no suitable questionnaire was available for this context.

    “The Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire III 27 was adapted for use within this study, as there was no suitable questionnaire available for use within this context.”

    From Telemedicine in dermatology: a randomised controlled trial (2006) · cites this paper as [27]

  • The Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire III was adapted for use in this study because no suitable questionnaire was available for this context, and nine items were added from a questionnaire developed for asynchronous teledermatology consultation.

    “The Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire III 27 was adapted for use within this study, as there was no suitable questionnaire available for use within this context.”

    From Telemedicine in dermatology: a randomised controlled trial (2006) · cites this paper as [27]

  • Satisfaction is an important criterion for health care quality and supports the development of health services.

    “Participants' satisfaction – i.e., the subjective evaluation of multiple facets of an experienced health care service with regard to a-priori expectations (Ware et al., 1983) – is an important criterion for health care quality and supports the development of health services (Samartzis and Talias, 2020).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ware, J. E., Snyder, M. K., Wright, W. R., & Davies, A. R.
Affiliations
RAND Corporation (US)
Corresponding author
Ware, John E.
Venue
Evaluation and Program Planning
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1983-01
Volume
6
Issue
3-4
Pages
247-263
ISSN
0149-7189 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1988042859
Cited by
1,259
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 44 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 47
FWCI
26.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Evaluation and Program Planning (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship@UMassChan (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
Keywords
patient satisfaction, patient satisfaction survey, questionnaire development, Likert scale, reliability statistics, validity, technical skills, waiting time, emergency care, health care costs, insurance coverage, hospital availability, self-administered questionnaire
MeSH terms
Consumer Behavior, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Health Services Research, Illinois, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Surveys and Questionnaires, Research Design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review