Cited by 1,044Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychometric Methodologies and TestingPsychological Testing and Assessment

The Hamilton Anxiety Scale: reliability, validity and sensitivity to change in anxiety and depressive disorders

Maier, Wolfgang, Buller, Raimund, Philipp, Michael, Heuser, Isabella·1988·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

The Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) was tested for reliability and validity in two different samples, one sample (n = 97) defined by anxiety disorders, the other sample (n = 101) defined by depressive disorders. The reliability and the concurrent validity of the HAM-A and its subscales proved to be sufficient. Internal validity tested by latent structure analysis was insufficient. The major problems with the HAM-A are that (1) anxiolytic and antidepressant effects cannot be clearly distinguished; (2) the subscale of somatic anxiety is strongly related to somatic side effects. The applicability of the HAM-A in anxiolytic treatment studies is therefore limited. More specific anxiety scales are needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0165-0327(88)90072-9

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 15 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maier, W., Buller, R., Philipp, M., & Heuser, I.
Affiliations
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
Corresponding author
Maier, Wolfgang
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1988-01
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
61-68
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2021803359
Cited by
1,044
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 102 · 2025: 132 · 2024: 122 · 2023: 77 · 2022: 81 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 12
FWCI
4.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, anxiety disorders, depressive disorders, psychometric validation, reliability statistics, concurrent validity, internal validity, latent structure analysis, anxiolytic treatment, antidepressant effects, sensitivity to change
MeSH terms
Agoraphobia, Alprazolam, Amitriptyline, Anxiety Disorders, Clinical Trials as Topic, Depressive Disorder, Humans, Imipramine, Panic, Psychological Tests, Psychometrics, Random Allocation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review