Cited by 69Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsNeurological disorders and treatmentsNeurological and metabolic disorders

Dysfunction in emotion processing underlies functional (psychogenic) dystonia

Open access
Espay, Alberto J., Maloney, Thomas, Vannest, Jennifer, Norris, Matthew M., Eliassen, James C., Neefus, Erin, Allendorfer, Jane B., Chen, Robert +1 more·2018·Movement Disorders

Abstract

Objective: We sought to determine whether abnormalities in emotion processing underlie functional (psychogenic) dystonia, one of the most common functional movement disorders. Methods: Motor and emotion circuits were examined in 12 participants with functional dystonia, 12 with primary organic dystonia, and 25 healthy controls using functional magnetic resonance imaging at 4T and a finger‐tapping task (motor task), a basic emotion‐recognition task (emotional faces task), and an intense‐emotion stimuli task. Results: There were no differences in motor task activation between groups. In the faces task, when compared with the other groups, functional dystonia patients showed areas of decreased activation in the right middle temporal gyrus and bilateral precuneus and increased activation in the right inferior frontal gyrus, bilateral occipital cortex and fusiform gyrus, and bilateral cerebellum. In the intense‐emotion task, when compared with the other groups, functional dystonia patients showed decreased activation in the left insular and left motor cortices (compared to organic dystonia, they showed an additional decrease in activation in the right opercular cortex and right motor cortex) and increased activation in the left fusiform gyrus. Conclusions: Functional dystonia patients exhibited stimulus‐dependent altered activation in networks involved in motor preparation and execution, spatial cognition, and attentional control. These results support the presence of network dysfunction in functional dystonia. © 2017 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/mds.27217

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Between-group differences in default mode, salience and sensorimotor network areas have been identified in a range of FND populations compared to controls.

    “While findings have not been entirely consistent across studies and FND sub-populations, between-group differences in default mode, salience and sensorimotor network areas have been identified in a range FND populations compared to controls.45,207,[209][210][211][212]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Espay, A. J., Maloney, T., Vannest, J., Norris, M. M., Eliassen, J. C., Neefus, E., Allendorfer, J. B., Chen, R., & Szaflarski, J. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • University Health Network (CA)
Corresponding author
Espay, Alberto J.
Venue
Movement Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-11-10
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
136-145
ISSN
  • 0885-3185 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-8257
OpenAlex
W2767961405
Cited by
69
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7
FWCI
5.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Movement Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (NS065701, 1K23MH092735, K23 NS052468, K01 DA020485)
  • NIH Clinical Center
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Neurological and metabolic disorders
Keywords
functional dystonia, psychogenic movement disorders, emotional processing, emotion recognition, emotional facial expressions, brain network dysfunction, fusiform gyrus, insula, middle temporal gyrus, precuneus, inferior frontal gyrus, cerebellum, motor cortex, attentional control, spatial cognition
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Brain Mapping, Face, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Oxygen, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Photic Stimulation, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychomotor Performance, Severity of Illness Index, Mood Disorders, Dystonic Disorders, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review