CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 590Tactile and Sensory InteractionsMultisensory perception and integrationVisual perception and processing mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Compensatory plasticity and sensory substitution in the cerebral cortex

Rauschecker, Josef P.·1995·Trends in Neurosciences
DOI 10.1016/0166-2236(95)93948-w
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Cats deprived visually from birth show few overt impairments in their natural behavior. Therefore, they seem well suited as an animal model for the study of compensatory plasticity after early vision loss. It can be demonstrated that binocularly deprived cats show improved abilities of auditory localization, and at least equal tactile behavior compared to normal controls. Within the anterior ectosylvian cortex of binocularly deprived cats, where different sensory modalities come together, the anterior ectosylvian visual area is completely taken over by auditory and somatosensory inputs. Furthermore, the auditory spatial tuning of single units in this cortical region is sharpened significantly as a result of visual deprivation. Somatosensory compensation for early loss of vision can be demonstrated by a hypertrophy of the facial vibrissae, and a corresponding expansion of their central representation in the somatosensory cortex of binocularly deprived animals. The compensatory changes in the cortex can be explained by a reorganization of sensory representations under the guidance of sensorimotor feedback rather than by instruction through an extraneous 'supervisory' signal. These processes might form the neural basis of sensory substitution in blind humans.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0166-2236(95)93948-w

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 85 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Juurmaa, 1975, Scand. J. Physiol., 16, 209
  2. Bagdonas, 1980, Hum. Physiol., 6, 108
  3. Rauschecker, 1992, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 18, 593
  4. Henning, 1991, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 17, 875
  5. Rauschecker, 1987, Neuroscience, 22, 222
  6. Rauschecker, 1992, 89, 5063
  7. Neville, 1994, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 20, 352
  8. Métin, 1989, 86, 357
  9. Carman, 1992, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 18, 593
  10. Merzenich, 1990, 55, 873
  11. Schwaber, 1993, Am. J. Otol., 14, 252

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 590

Related

Metadata

Authors
Rauschecker, J. P.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Rauschecker, Josef P.
ORCID
Rauschecker, Josef P.
Venue
Trends in Neurosciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-01
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
36-43
ISSN
0166-2236 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/0166-2236(95)93948-w
OpenAlex
W1975230707
Cited by
590
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 21
FWCI
3.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Trends in Neurosciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
compensatory plasticity, sensory substitution, congenital blindness, sound localization, tactile behavior, somatosensory cortex, sensorimotor feedback, cross-modal plasticity
MeSH terms
Animals, Auditory Cortex, Blindness, Cats, Cerebral Cortex, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Neuronal Plasticity, Somatosensory Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review