Cited by 41Animal Virus Infections StudiesViral Infections and Immunology ResearchVirology and Viral Diseases

Protection of non-murine mammals against encephalomyocarditis virus using a genetically engineered Mengo virus

Osorio, Jorge E., Hubbard, Gene B., Soike, Kenneth F., Girard, Marc, van der Werf, Sylvie, Moulin, Jean-Claude, Palmenberg, Ann C.·1996·Vaccine

Abstract

Genetically engineered Mengo viruses with artificial deletions in the 5' noncoding poly(C) tracts are highly attenuated for pathogenicity when introduced as live vaccines into the natural murine host. Inoculation produces lifelong protective immunity without disease or viral persistence. This report extends the vaccination studies to non-murine hosts, including baboons, macaques and domestic pigs, all of which are susceptible to severe cardiovirus epizootics. All animals of these species that were inoculated with vMC24, an engineered strain of Mengo, seroconverted. When the immunized animals were challenged, they were protected against lethal doses of encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV) derived from currently circulating epizootic strains. In baboons, the neutralizing antibody titers induced by vMC24 were significantly higher than from an inactivated EMCV vaccine. Moreover, terminal histopathology on baboons (inoculated intramuscularly), macaques (inoculated intracerebrally), and pigs (inoculated intramuscularly) showed few, if any, gross lesions characteristic of EMCV-like disease, in the vMC24 vaccinates. We suggest that genetically engineered, short poly(C) Mengo viruses may be universally potent attenuated vaccines for many types of animals and can possibly provide safe, efficacious protection against all cardioviruses of the EMCV serotype.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0264-410x(95)00129-o

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Osorio, J. E., Hubbard, G. B., Soike, K. F., Girard, M., van der Werf, S., Moulin, J.-C., & Palmenberg, A. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Texas Biomedical Research Institute (US)
  • Tulane University (US)
  • Institut Pasteur (FR)
Corresponding author
Palmenberg, Ann C.
Venue
Vaccine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-02
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
155-161
ISSN
0264-410X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2013698424
Cited by
41
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Vaccine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ai030566-09)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI-30566)
  • National Center for Research Resources (P51RR000164, RR00164.)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Virus Infections Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Viral Infections and Immunology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Virology and Viral Diseases
Keywords
encephalomyocarditis virus, mengovirus, live attenuated vaccine, 5' untranslated region, baboons, macaque, pigs, neutralizing antibodies, seroconversion, vaccine safety
MeSH terms
Animals, Encephalomyocarditis virus, Female, Genetic Engineering, HeLa Cells, Humans, Macaca mulatta, Mengovirus, Papio, Poly C, Swine, Viral Vaccines, Cardiovirus Infections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review