Cited by 540Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsTreatment of Major Depression

Long-term potentiation of guinea pig mossy fiber responses is not blocked by N-methyl d-aspartate antagonists

Harris, Eric W., Cotman, Carl W.·1986·Neuroscience Letters

Abstract

Receptors preferentially activated by the excitatory amino acid N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) do not mediate synaptic transmission in the hippocampus but are involved in initiating long-term potentiation (LTP) in hippocampal region CA1. We have examined the role of NMDA receptors in LTP of the commissural/associational and mossy fiber pathways to region CA3 pyramidal neurons. In the commissural/associational pathway, NMDA receptor blockers did not reduce synaptic responses but reversibly blocked the induction of LTP. In contrast, NMDA receptor blockers had no effect on mossy fiber LTP. These results suggest that induction of commissural/associational LTP differs from mossy fiber LTP, although the mechanisms underlying expression of LTP along these pathways could be similar. Kynurenate and L-2-amino-4-phosphonobutyrate, which potently reduce mossy fiber responses, also did not block induction of mossy fiber LTP.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0304-3940(86)90451-9

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mossy fiber LTP is NMDA-independent.

    “For example, perforant path and the Schaffer collateral pathway LTP are both dependent on the activation of NMDA receptors (Bliss and Collingridge, 1993), whereas mossy fiber/CA3 LTP is not (Harris and Cotman, 1986;Z alutsky and Nicoll, 1990).”

    From Type I Adenylyl Cyclase Mutant Mice Have Impaired Mossy Fiber Long-Term Potentiation (1998) · cites this paper as Harris and Cotman, 1986

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harris, E. W., & Cotman, C. W.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Harris, Eric W.
Venue
Neuroscience Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1986-09
Volume
70
Issue
1
Pages
132-137
ISSN
0304-3940 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1995054580
Cited by
540
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 13
FWCI
7.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
long-term potentiation, NMDA receptor, mossy fiber pathway, hippocampal CA3 pyramidal neurons, NMDA receptor antagonists, kynurenic acid, synaptic transmission, LTP induction
MeSH terms
Aminobutyrates, Animals, Evoked Potentials, Guinea Pigs, Hippocampus, Kynurenic Acid, Neural Pathways, Synaptic Transmission, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Receptors, Neurotransmitter, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review