Cited by 1,342Corporate Finance and GovernanceCorporate Governance and LawMerger and Competition Analysis

One-share-one-vote and the market for corporate control

Open access
Grossman, Sanford J., Hart, Oliver D.·1988·Journal of Financial Economics

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0304-405x(88)90044-x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The research on ownership patterns originates in the work of Grossman and Hart (1988) and Harris and Raviv (1988), who examine the optimal allocation of voting and cash flow rights in a firm.

    “The research in this area originates in the work of Grossman and Hart (1988) and Harris and Raviv (1988), who examine the optimal allocation of voting and cash flow rights in a firm.”

    From Investor protection and corporate governance (2000) · cites this paper as Grossman and Hart (1988)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Baron, D.P.,, 1983, Tender offers and management resistance, Journal of Finance 38, May, 331—43.
  2. Binmore, K., Rubinstein, A. and A. Wolinsky, 1986, The Nash bargaining solution in economic modelling, The Rand Journal of Economics, 17(2), (Summer) 176—188.
  3. DeAngelo, Harry, Linda DeAngelo and Edward H. Rice, 1984, Going private: Minority freezeouts and stockholder wealth, Journal of Law and Econoics 27(2), 367—401.
  4. DeAngelo, Harry and Linda DeAngelo, 1985, Managerial ownership of voting rights: A study of public corporations with dual classes of common stock Journal of Financial Economics 14(1), 33—69.
  5. Demsetz, Harold, 1983, The structure of ownership and the theory of the firm, Journal of Law and Economics 26(2), 375—390.
  6. Dodd, Peter and Jerold B. Warner, 1983, On corporate governance: A study of proxy contests, Journal of Financial Economics 11, 401—438.
  7. Easterbrook, Frank H. and Daniel R. Fischel, 1982, Corporate control transactions, Yale Law Journal 91, 698—737.
  8. Easterbrook, Frank H. and Daniel R. Fischel, 1983, Voting in corporate law Journal of Law and Economics 26(2), 395—428.
  9. Fischel, Daniel R., 1963, Appraisal remedy in corporate law, American Bar Foundation Research Journal 4, 875—902.
  10. Grossman, Sanford J., and Oliver D.Hart, 1980, Takeover bids, the free—rider problem, and the theory of corporation, Bell Journal of Economics 11, (Spring) 42—64.
  11. Grossman, Sanford 3.,, and Oliver D. Hart, 1981, The allocational role of takeover bids in situations of asymmetric information, Journal of Finance 36 (May), 253—270.
  12. Grossman, Sanford 3., and Oliver D. Hart, 1986, The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration, Journal of Political Economy 94(4), 691—719.
  13. Jensen, Michael C. and William H. Meckling, 1976, Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure, Journal of Financial Economics 3, 305—360.
  14. Jensen, Michael and Richard Ruback, 1983, The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence, Journal of Financial Economics, April, 5—50.
  15. Lease, Ronald C., John 3. McConnell and Wayne H. Mikkelson, 1984, The market value of differential voting rights in closely held corporations, Journal of Business 57(4), 443—467.
  16. Levy, Haim, 1983, Economic evaluation of voting power of common stock, Journal of Finance 38, 79—93.
  17. Nanne, Henry G., 1965, Mergers and the market for corporate control, Journal of Political Economy (April) 110—120.
  18. Marris, Robin, 1964, The economic theory of managerial capitalism, Illinois: Free Press of Glencoe.
  19. Mayers, D. and C. Smith, Jr., 1986, Ownership structure and control: The mutualizatjon of stock life insurance companies, Journal of Financial Economics (May) 73—98.
  20. Shleifer, Andrei, and Robert V. Vishny, 1986, Large shareholders and corporate control, Journal of Political Economy 94(3), 461—488.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grossman, S. J., & Hart, O. D.
Affiliations
  • Princeton University (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Journal of Financial Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1988-01
Volume
20
Pages
175-202
ISSN
0304-405X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3121886422
Cited by
1,342
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 50 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 62 · 2012: 62
FWCI
44.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Financial Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Corporate Finance and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Governance and Law
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Merger and Competition Analysis
Keywords
one share one vote, corporate control, takeover bids, private benefits of control, corporate governance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review