Cited by 68Advanced Drug Delivery SystemsInhalation and Respiratory Drug DeliveryAdvancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery

Nasal absorption of naloxone and buprenorphine in rats

Hussain, Anwar, Kimura, Ryohei, Chong-Heng, Huang, Kashihara, Toshio·1984·International Journal of Pharmaceutics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0378-5173(84)90097-8

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hussain, A., Kimura, R., Chong-Heng, H., & Kashihara, T.
Affiliations
University of Kentucky (US)
Corresponding author
Hussain, Anwar
Venue
International Journal of Pharmaceutics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1984-09
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
233-237
ISSN
0378-5173 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1964852963
Cited by
68
References
9
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Pharmaceutics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
Keywords
intranasal drug delivery, naloxone, buprenorphine, nasal bioavailability, intraduodenal administration, intravenous administration, opioid analgesics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review