Cited by 51Opioid Use Disorder TreatmentPoisoning and overdose treatmentsSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Intranasal naloxone for the treatment of suspected heroin overdose

Kerr, Debra, Dietze, Paul, Kelly, Anne‐Maree·2008·Addiction

Abstract

AIMS: This paper reviews available literature regarding the effectiveness, safety and utility of intranasal (i.n.) naloxone for the treatment of heroin overdose. METHODS: Scientific literature in the form of published articles during the period January 1984 to August 2007 were identified by searching several databases including Medline, Cinahl and Embase for the following terms: naloxone, narcan, intranasal, nose. The data extracted included study design, patient selection, numbers, outcomes and adverse events. RESULTS: Reports of the pharmacological investigation and administration of i.n. naloxone for heroin overdose are included in this review. Treatment of heroin overdose by administration of i.n. naloxone has been introduced as first-line treatment in some jurisdictions in North America, and is currently under investigation in Australia. CONCLUSION: Currently there is not enough evidence to support i.n. naloxone as first-line intervention by paramedics for treatment of heroin overdose in the pre-hospital setting. Further research is required to confirm its clinical effectiveness, safety and utility. If proved effective, the i.n. route may be useful for drug administration in community settings (including peer-based administration), as it reduces risk of needlestick injury in a population at higher risk of blood-borne viruses. Problematically, naloxone is not manufactured currently in an ideal form for i.n. administration.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.02097.x

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kerr, D., Dietze, P., & Kelly, A.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Burnet Institute (AU)
Corresponding author
Kerr, Debra
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-02-05
Volume
103
Issue
3
Pages
379-386
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W1968579884
Cited by
51
References
68
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Poisoning and overdose treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
intranasal naloxone, heroin overdose, opioid overdose treatment, prehospital care, paramedics, first-line intervention, adverse events, needlestick injuries, blood-borne viruses
MeSH terms
Administration, Intranasal, Heroin, Emergencies, Humans, Naloxone, Narcotic Antagonists, Drug Overdose

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review