Cited by 70Advanced Drug Delivery SystemsOpioid Use Disorder TreatmentInhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery

A response to the opioid overdose epidemic: Naloxone nasal spray

Open access
Wermeling, Daniel P.·2013·Drug Delivery and Translational Research

Abstract

Opioid overdose morbidity and mortality is recognized to have epidemic proportions. Medical and public health agencies are adopting opioid harm reduction strategies to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with overdose. One strategy developed by emergency medical services and public health agencies is to deliver the opioid antidote naloxone injection intranasally to reverse the effects of opioids. Paramedics have used this route to quickly administer naloxone in a needle-free system and avoiding needle-stick injuries and contracting a blood-born pathogen disease such as hepatitis or human immunodeficiency virus. Public health officials advocate broader lay person access since civilians are likely witnesses or first responders to an opioid overdose in a time-acute setting. The barrier to greater use of naloxone is that a suitable and optimized needlefree drug delivery system is unavailable. The scientific basis for design and study of an intranasal naloxone product is described. Lessons from nasal delivery of opioid analgesics are applied to the consideration of naloxone nasal spray.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s13346-012-0092-0

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most studies and clinical applications of NAL have delivered NAL by the i.v., i.m., or s.c. route, with the i.v. route being the recommended route.

    “Most studies and clinical applications of NAL have delivered NAL by the i.v., i.m., or s.c. route, with the i.v. route being the recommended route (57).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. [35]Constantino HR Illum L Brandt G Intl J Pharmaceutics 2007 337 1 24 17475423
  2. [58]Barton ED Colwell CB Wolfe T Fosnocht D Gravitz C Bryan T Efficacy of intranasal naloxone as a needleless alternative for treatment of opioid overdose in the prehospital setting J Emerg Med 2005 29 265 71 16183444
  3. [59]Barton ED Ramos J Colwell C Benson J Baily J Dunn W Intranasal administration of naloxone by paramedics Prehosp Emerg Care 2002 6 54 8 11789651
  4. [62]Seal KH Thawley R Gee L Naloxone distribution and cardiopulmonary resuscitation training for injection drug users to prevent heroin overdose death: A pilot intervention study Journal of Urban Health, Bulletin of the New York Academic of Medicine 2005 82 02 303 311 PMC2570543 15872192
  5. [63]Maxwell S Bigg D Stanczykiewicz K Carlberg S Prescribing naloxone to actively injection heroin users: a program to reduce heroin overdose death J Addictive Diseases 2006 25 3 89 96 16956873
  6. [64]Piper TM Rudenstine S Stancliff S Overdose prevention for injection drug users: Lessons learned from naloxone training and distribution programs in New York City Harm Reduction Journal 2007 4 3 1 8 17254345 PMC1797013
  7. [65]Sporer KA Kral AH Prescription naloxone: A novel approach to heroin overdose prevention Ann Emerg Med 2007 49 2 172 177 17141138
  8. [66]Green TC Heimer R Grau LE Distinguishing signs of opioid overdose and indication for naloxone: an evaluation of six overdose training and distribution programs in the US Addiction 2008 1 11 PMC3163671 18422830
  9. [68]Sherman SG Gann DS Tobin KE “The life they same may be mine”: Diffusion of overdose prevention information from a city sponsored programme Int J Drug Policy 2009 20 137 142 18502635

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wermeling, D. P.
Affiliations
University of Kentucky (US)
Corresponding author
Wermeling, Daniel P.
Venue
Drug Delivery and Translational Research
Published
2012-08-01
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
63-74
ISSN
  • 2190-393X (ISSN-L)
  • 2190-3948
OpenAlex
W1999051465
Cited by
70
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6
FWCI
2.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Drug Delivery and Translational Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (R42DA030001)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
Keywords
naloxone, intranasal drug delivery, opioid overdose, needle-free drug delivery, paramedics, first responders, needlestick injuries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review