Cited by 75Opioid Use Disorder TreatmentPoisoning and overdose treatmentsSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Intranasal naloxone delivery is an alternative to intravenous naloxone for opioid overdoses

Merlin, Mark A., Saybolt, Matthew, Kapitanyan, Raffi, Alter, Scott M., Jeges, Janos, Liu, Junfeng, Calabrese, Susan, Rynn, Kevin O. +2 more·2010·The American Journal of Emergency Medicine

Abstract

Introduction This study proposes that intranasal (IN) naloxone administration is preferable to intravenous (IV) naloxone by emergency medical services for opioid overdoses. Our study attempts to establish that IN naloxone is as effective as IV naloxone but without the risk of needle exposure. We also attempt to validate the use of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) in opioid intoxication.Methods A retrospective chart review of prehospital advanced life support patients was performed on confirmed opioid overdose patients. Initial and final unassisted respiratory rates (RR) and GCS, recorded by paramedics, were used as indicators of naloxone effectiveness. The median changes in RR and GCS were determined.Results Three hundred forty-four patients who received naloxone by paramedics from January 1, 2005, until December 31, 2007, were evaluated. Of confirmed opioid overdoses, change in RR was 6 for the IV group and 4 for the IN group (P = .08). Change in GCS was 4 for the IV group and 3 for the IN group (P = .19). Correlations between RR and GCS for initial, final, and change were significant at the 0.01 level (rho = 0.577, 0.462, 0.568, respectively).Conclusion Intranasal naloxone is statistically as effective as IV naloxone at reversing the effects of opioid overdose. The IV and IN groups had similar average increases in RR and GCS. Based on our results, IN naloxone is a viable alternative to IV naloxone while posing less risk of needle stick injury. Additionally, we demonstrated that GCS is correlated with RR in opioid intoxication.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajem.2008.12.009

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Merlin, M. A., Saybolt, M., Kapitanyan, R., Alter, S. M., Jeges, J., Liu, J., Calabrese, S., Rynn, K. O., Perritt, R., & Pryor, P. W.
Affiliations
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (US)
  • Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Merlin, Mark A.
Venue
The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-03
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
296-303
ISSN
0735-6757 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2049034159
Cited by
75
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Poisoning and overdose treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
intranasal naloxone, opioid overdose, prehospital care, paramedics, Glasgow Coma Scale, respiratory rate, needlestick injuries, opioid toxicity
MeSH terms
Administration, Intranasal, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Injections, Intravenous, Male, Middle Aged, Naloxone, Narcotic Antagonists, Opioid-Related Disorders, Retrospective Studies, Chi-Square Distribution, Treatment Outcome, Statistics, Nonparametric, Drug Overdose

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review