CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 216

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Factors influencing the use of a decision rule in a probabilistic task

Arkes, Hal R, Dawes, Robyn M, Christensen, Caryn·1986·Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
DOI 10.1016/0749-5978(86)90046-4
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0749-5978(86)90046-4

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Adelman, 1982, An iterative Bayesian decision aid: Toward improving the user-aid and user-organization interfaces, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 12, 733, 10.1109/TSMC.1982.4308907 · DOI
  2. Ajzen, 1977, Intuitive theories of events and effects of base-rate information on prediction, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 303, 10.1037/0022-3514.35.5.303 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Arkes, 1984, A demonstration of the costs and benefits of expertise in recognition memory, Memory & Cognition, 12, 84, 10.3758/BF03197000 · DOI
  4. Arkes, 1980, The effect of making a diagnosis on subsequent recognition of symptoms, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 568, 10.1037/0278-7393.6.5.568 · DOI
  5. Arkes, 1983, Estimates of contingency between two dichotomous variables, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 117, 10.1037/0096-3445.112.1.117 · DOI
  6. Bar-Hillel, 1980, The base-rate fallacy in probability judgments, Acta Psychologica, 44, 211, 10.1016/0001-6918(80)90046-3 · DOI
  7. Brehmer, 1978, Task information and performance in probabilistic inference tasks, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 22, 445, 10.1016/0030-5073(78)90027-2 · DOI
  8. Dawes, 1971, A case study of graduate admissions: Application of three principles of human decision making, American Psychologist, 26, 180, 10.1037/h0030868 · DOI
  9. Dawes, 1979, The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making, American Psychologist, 34, 571, 10.1037/0003-066X.34.7.571 · DOI
  10. Dawes, 1974, Linear models in decision making, Psychological Bulletin, 81, 95, 10.1037/h0037613 · DOI
  11. deDombal, 1974, Human and computer-aided diagnosis of abdominal pain: Further report with emphasis on performance of clinicians, British Medical Journal, 1, 376, 10.1136/bmj.1.5904.376 · DOI
  12. Dollinger, 1984, On penetrating the “mask”: The role of sagacity and acumen in a word-association/clinical-judgment task, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 145, 10.1037/0022-3514.46.1.145 · DOI
  13. Einhorn, 1972, Expert measurement and mechanical combination, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 7, 86, 10.1016/0030-5073(72)90009-8 · DOI
  14. Goldberg, 1968, Simple models or simple processes? Some research on clinical judgments, American Psychologist, 23, 483, 10.1037/h0026206 · DOI
  15. Hammond, 1972, Cognitive control, Psychological Review, 79, 58, 10.1037/h0031851 · DOI
  16. Hammond, 1973, Negative effects of outcome feedback in multiple cue probability learning experiments, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 9, 30, 10.1016/0030-5073(73)90034-2 · DOI
  17. Hansen, 1977, The power of consensus: Information derived from one's own behavior, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 294, 10.1037/0022-3514.35.5.294 · DOI
  18. Komaroff, 1982, Algorithms and the “art” of medicine, American Journal of Public Health, 72, 10, 10.2105/AJPH.72.1.10 · DOI
  19. Lichtenstein, 1978, Judged frequency of lethal events, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 551, 10.1037/0278-7393.4.6.551 · DOI
  20. Little, 1959, Congruencies among interpretations of psychological test and anamnestic data, Psychological Monographs, 73, 10.1037/h0093742 · DOI
  21. Manis, 1980, Base rates can affect individual predictions, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 231, 10.1037/0022-3514.38.2.231 · DOI
  22. Myers, 1976, Probability learning and sequence learning, Vol. 6
  23. Schmitt, 1976, Feedback and task predictability as determinants of performance in multiple cue probability learning tasks, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 388, 10.1016/0030-5073(76)90023-4 · DOI
  24. Schwartz, 1982, Reinforcement-induced behavioral stereotypy: How not to teach people to discover rules, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 23, 10.1037/0096-3445.111.1.23 · DOI
  25. Schwartz, 1979, Decision analysis: A look at the chief complaints, New England Journal of Medicine, 300, 556, 10.1056/NEJM197903083001011 · DOI
  26. Wade, 1977, Opinions and use of psychological tests: A survey of clinical psychologists, American Psychologist, 32, 874, 10.1037/0003-066X.32.10.874 · DOI
  27. Wells, 1977, Do people use consensus information in making causal attributions?, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 279, 10.1037/0022-3514.35.5.279 · DOI
  28. Zukier, 1984, Social roles and strategies in prediction: Some determinants of the use of base-rate information, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 349, 10.1037/0022-3514.47.2.349 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Arkes, H. R., Dawes, R. M., & Christensen, C.
Venue
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1986-02
Volume
37
Issue
1
Pages
93-110
ISSN
0749-5978
DOI
10.1016/0749-5978(86)90046-4
Cited by
216
References
3
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review