The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Persuasion and context: The pragmatics of academic metadiscourse
Hyland, K. (1998) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/s0378-2166(98)00009-5 · Cited by 422
Hooking the reader: a corpus study of evaluative that in abstracts
Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2005) · English for Specific Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.esp.2004.02.002 · Cited by 404
Perceptions of the difficulties of postgraduate L2 thesis students writing the discussion section
Bitchener, J., & Basturkmen, H. (2006) · Journal of English for Academic Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2005.10.002 · Cited by 352
The medical research paper: Structure and functions
Nwogu, K. N. (1997) · English for Specific Purposes · doi:10.1016/s0889-4906(97)85388-4 · Cited by 270
Qualification and certainty in L1 and L2 students' writing
Hyland, K., & Milton, J. (1997) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(97)90033-3 · Cited by 267
Research paper titles in literature, linguistics and science: dimensions of attraction
Haggan, M. (2004) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/s0378-2166(03)00090-0 · Cited by 202
Gray, B. (2010) · Journal of English for Academic Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2009.11.003 · Cited by 135
Dimensions of difference: a comparison of university writing and IELTS writing
Moore, T., & Morton, J. (2005) · Journal of English for Academic Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2004.02.001 · Cited by 135
Friend, S. (2012) · Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback) · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9264.2012.00331.x · Cited by 97
Discourse synthesis: Textual transformations in writing from sources
Nelson, N., & King, J. R. (2023) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-021-10243-5 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Johns, A. M.
- Venue
- English for Specific Purposes
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1992-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 83-85
- ISSN
- 0889-4906 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2936540326
- Cited by
- 766
- References
- 0
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.