CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 17

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cognition as a cause, consequence, and component of welfare

Franks, Becca·2018·Advances in Agricultural Animal Welfare
DOI 10.1016/b978-0-08-101215-4.00001-8
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-08-101215-4.00001-8

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cognition is a cause and consequence of welfare but can later affect cognitive functions.

    “Cognition is a cause and consequence of welfare but can later affect cognitive functions [62].”

    From Therapy Dog Welfare Revisited: A Review of the Literature (2021) · cites this paper as [62]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 114

  1. Abeyesinghe, 2005, Can domestic fowl, Gallus gallus domesticus, show self-control?, Anim. Behav., 70, 1, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.10.011 · DOI
  2. Abou-Ismail, 2011, Are the effects of enrichment due to the presence of multiple items or a particular item in the cages of laboratory rat?, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 134, 72, 10.1016/j.applanim.2011.06.007 · DOI
  3. Alworth, 2013, The effects of music on animal physiology, behavior and welfare, Lab. Anim. (NY), 42, 54, 10.1038/laban.162 · DOI
  4. Asher, 2016, Mood and personality interact to determine cognitive biases in pigs, Biol. Lett., 12, 20160402, 10.1098/rsbl.2016.0402 · DOI
  5. Baciadonna, 2015, The use of judgement bias to assess welfare in farm livestock, Anim. Welf., 24, 81, 10.7120/09627286.24.1.081 · DOI
  6. Baker, 2016, Personality differences in a translocated population of endangered kangaroo rats (Dipodomys stephensi) and implications for conservation success, Behaviour, 153, 1795, 10.1163/1568539X-00003380 · DOI
  7. Bassett, 2007, Effects of predictability on the welfare of captive animals, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 102, 223, 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.029 · DOI
  8. Bateson, 2011, Agitated honeybees exhibit pessimistic cognitive biases, Curr. Biol., 21, 1070, 10.1016/j.cub.2011.05.017 · DOI
  9. Bell, 2009, Environmental enrichment influences survival rate and enhances exploration and learning but produces variable responses to the radial maze in old rats, Dev. Psychobiol., 51, 564, 10.1002/dev.20394 · DOI
  10. Boissy, 1995, Assessment of individual differences in behavioural reactions of heifers exposed to various fear-eliciting situations, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 46, 17, 10.1016/0168-1591(95)00633-8 · DOI
  11. Boissy, 2014, How assessing relationships between emotions and cognition can improve farm animal welfare, Rev. Sci. Tech., 33, 103, 10.20506/rst.33.1.2260 · DOI
  12. Boissy, 2007, Emotion and cognition: a new approach to animal welfare, Anim. Welf, 16, 37, 10.1017/S0962728600031717 · DOI
  13. Boissy, 2011, Cognitive sciences to relate ear postures to emotions in sheep, Anim. Welf, 20, 47, 10.1017/S0962728600002426 · DOI
  14. Braithwaite, 2005, Environmental variability in the early rearing environment generates behaviourally flexible cod: implications for rehabilitating wild populations, Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci., 272, 1107, 10.1098/rspb.2005.3062 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Broom, 2007, Cognitive ability and sentience: which aquatic animals should be protected?, Dis. Aquat. Org., 75, 99, 10.3354/dao075099 · DOI
  16. Broom, 2010, Cognitive ability and awareness in domestic animals and decisions about obligations to animals, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 126, 1, 10.1016/j.applanim.2010.05.001 · DOI
  17. Brown, 2015, Fish intelligence, sentience and ethics, Anim. Cogn., 18, 1, 10.1007/s10071-014-0761-0 · DOI
  18. Burghardt, 2013, Environmental enrichment and cognitive complexity in reptiles and amphibians: concepts, review, and implications for captive populations, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 147, 286, 10.1016/j.applanim.2013.04.013 · DOI
  19. Burman, 2008, Removing individual rats affects indicators of welfare in the remaining group members, Physiol. Behav., 93, 89, 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.08.001 · DOI
  20. Butler, 1953, Discrimination learning by rhesus monkeys to visual-exploration motivation, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 46, 95, 10.1037/h0061616 · DOI
  21. Campo, 2005, Effects of specific noise and music stimuli on stress and fear levels of laying hens of several breeds, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 91, 75, 10.1016/j.applanim.2004.08.028 · DOI
  22. Cañon Jones, 2012, Investigating the influence of predictable and unpredictable feed delivery schedules upon the behaviour and welfare of Atlantic salmon parr (Salmo salar) using social network analysis and fin damage, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 138, 132, 10.1016/j.applanim.2012.01.019 · DOI
  23. Carere, 2011, Interaction between animal personality and animal cognition, Curr. Zool., 57, 491, 10.1093/czoolo/57.4.491 · DOI
  24. Carlstead, 1986, Predictability of feeding: its effect on agonistic behaviour and growth in grower pigs, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 16, 25, 10.1016/0168-1591(86)90037-7 · DOI
  25. Chase, 2001, Music discriminations by carp (Cyprinus carpio), Anim. Learn. Behav., 29, 336, 10.3758/BF03192900 · DOI
  26. Chiandetti, 2011, Chicks like consonant music, Psychol. Sci., 22, 1270, 10.1177/0956797611418244 · DOI
  27. Costa, 2016, Invited review: effects of group housing of dairy calves on behavior, cognition, performance, and health, J. Dairy Sci., 99, 2453, 10.3168/jds.2015-10144 · DOI
  28. Crawley, 1985, Exploratory behavior models of anxiety in mice, Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 9, 37, 10.1016/0149-7634(85)90030-2 · DOI
  29. Croney, 2007, Group size and cognitive processes, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 103, 215, 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.023 · DOI
  30. Cussen, 2014, Personality predicts cognitive bias in captive psittacines, Amazona amazonica, Anim. Behav., 89, 123, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.12.022 · DOI
  31. Dawkins, 1990, From an animal’s point of view: motivation, fitness, and animal welfare, Behav. Brain Sci., 13, 1, 10.1017/S0140525X00077104 · DOI
  32. de Groot, 2001, Long-term effects of social stress on antiviral immunity in pigs, Physiol. Behav., 73, 145, 10.1016/S0031-9384(01)00472-3 · DOI
  33. De Jonge, 2008, Music during play-time: using context conditioning as a tool to improve welfare in piglets, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 115, 138, 10.1016/j.applanim.2008.04.009 · DOI
  34. De Passillé, 1995, Interpreting the behavior of calves in an open-field test—a factor-analysis, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 45, 201, 10.1016/0168-1591(95)00622-Y · DOI
  35. De Paula Vieira, 2010, Effects of pair versus single housing on performance and behavior of dairy calves before and after weaning from milk, J. Dairy Sci., 93, 3079, 10.3168/jds.2009-2516 · DOI
  36. de Waal, 2012, The antiquity of empathy, Science, 336, 874, 10.1126/science.1220999 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Desire, 2002, Emotions in farm animals: a new approach to animal welfare in applied ethology, Behav. Process., 60, 165
  38. Destrez, 2013, Chronic stress induces pessimistic-like judgment and learning deficits in sheep, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 148, 28, 10.1016/j.applanim.2013.07.016 · DOI
  39. Dingemanse, 2010, Behavioural reaction norms: animal personality meets individual plasticity, Trends Ecol. Evol., 25, 81, 10.1016/j.tree.2009.07.013 · DOI
  40. Dixon, 2015, Early experiences matter: a review of the effects of prenatal environment on offspring characteristics in poultry, Poult. Sci., 95, 489, 10.3382/ps/pev343 · DOI
  41. Edgar, 2013, Protective mother hens: cognitive influences on the avian maternal response, Anim. Behav., 86, 223, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.05.004 · DOI
  42. Ennaceur, 2014, Tests of unconditioned anxiety—pitfalls and disappointments, Physiol. Behav, 135, 55, 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.05.032 · DOI
  43. Forkman, 2007, A critical review of fear tests used on cattle, pigs, sheep, poultry and horses, Physiol. Behav., 92, 340, 10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.03.016 · DOI
  44. Frankenhuis, 2016, Cognition in harsh and unpredictable environments, Curr. Opin. Psychol., 7, 76, 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.08.011 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Franks, 2012, Effectiveness in humans and other animals: a common basis for well-being and welfare, vol. 46, 285
  46. Franks, 2012, Evidence for individual differences in regulatory focus in rats, Rattus norvegicus, J. Comp. Psychol., 126, 347, 10.1037/a0027244 · DOI
  47. Franks, 2013, How enrichment affects exploration trade-offs in rats: implications for welfare and well-being, PLoS One, 8, e83578, 10.1371/journal.pone.0083578 · DOI
  48. Franks, 2013, Predicting how individuals approach enrichment: regulatory focus in cotton-top tamarins (Sanguinus oedipus), Zoo Biol., 32, 427, 10.1002/zoo.21075 · DOI
  49. Franks, 2014, A theoretically based model of rat personality with implications for welfare, PLoS One, 9, e95135, 10.1371/journal.pone.0095135 · DOI
  50. Fureix, 2015, What can inactivity (in its various forms) reveal about affective states in non-human animals? A review, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 171, 8, 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.08.036 · DOI
  51. Gaillard, 2014, Social housing improves dairy calves’ performance in two cognitive tests, PLoS One, 9, e90205, 10.1371/journal.pone.0090205 · DOI
  52. Galhardo, 2011, The role of predictability in the stress response of a cichlid fish, Physiol. Behav., 102, 367, 10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.11.035 · DOI
  53. Greiveldinger, 2011, The ability of lambs to form expectations and the emotional consequences of a discrepancy from their expectations, Psychoneuroendo, 36, 806, 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2010.11.002 · DOI
  54. Grimberg-Henrici, 2016, Effects of environmental enrichment on cognitive performance of pigs in a spatial holeboard discrimination task, Anim. Cogn., 19, 271, 10.1007/s10071-015-0932-7 · DOI
  55. Gygax, 2014, The A to Z of statistics for testing cognitive judgement bias, Anim. Behav., 95, 59, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.06.013 · DOI
  56. Hagen, 2004, Emotional reactions to learning in cattle, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 85, 203, 10.1016/j.applanim.2003.11.007 · DOI
  57. Harlow, 1950, Learning and satiation of response in intrinsically motivated complex puzzle performance by monkeys, J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 43, 289, 10.1037/h0058114 · DOI
  58. Harris, 2010, A cage without a view increases stress and impairs cognitive performance in rats, Anim. Welf., 19, 235, 10.1017/S0962728600001615 · DOI
  59. Hebb, 1947, The effects of early experience on problem solving at maturity, Am. Psychol., 2, 306
  60. Held, 2001, Studies in social cognition: from primates to pigs, Anim. Welf, 10, S209, 10.1017/S0962728600023630 · DOI
  61. Higgins, 2014, “Happiness” and “The Good Life” as motives working together effectively, Adv. Motivat. Sci., 1, 1
  62. Holley, 2014, Predictability of food supply, but not ration, increases exploratory behaviour in zebrafish Danio rerio, J. Fish. Biol., 85, 597, 10.1111/jfb.12441 · DOI
  63. Hughes, 1997, Intrinsic exploration in animals: motives and measurement, Behav. Process., 41, 213, 10.1016/S0376-6357(97)00055-7 · DOI
  64. Johannesson, 2000, The effect of irregular feeding times on the behaviour and growth of dairy calves, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 69, 103, 10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00127-1 · DOI
  65. Kistler, 2011, Preference for structured environment in zebrafish (Danio rerio) and checker barbs (Puntius oligolepis), Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 135, 318, 10.1016/j.applanim.2011.10.014 · DOI
  66. Langbein, 2009, On the use of an automated learning device by group-housed dwarf goats: do goats seek cognitive challenges?, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 120, 150, 10.1016/j.applanim.2009.07.006 · DOI
  67. Lea, 2001, Anticipation and memory as criteria for special welfare consideration, Anim. Welf, 10, S195, 10.1017/S0962728600023629 · DOI
  68. Mandel, 2016, Invited review: environmental enrichment of dairy cows and calves in indoor housing, J. Dairy Sci., 99, 1695, 10.3168/jds.2015-9875 · DOI
  69. Martin, 2015, The influence of neonatal environment on piglet play behaviour and post-weaning social and cognitive development, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 163, 67, 10.1016/j.applanim.2014.11.022 · DOI
  70. Mason, 2010, Species differences in responses to captivity: stress, welfare and the comparative method, Trends Ecol. Evol., 25, 713, 10.1016/j.tree.2010.08.011 · DOI · Paper page
  71. Mason, 2004, Can’t stop, won’t stop: is stereotypy a reliable animal welfare indicator?, Anim. Welf, 13, S57, 10.1017/S096272860001438X · DOI · Paper page
  72. Matthews, 1994, Environmental requirements of pigs measured by behavioural demand functions, Anim. Behav., 47, 713, 10.1006/anbe.1994.1096 · DOI
  73. Meagher, 2012, Environmental enrichment reduces signs of boredom in caged mink, PLoS One, 7, e49180, 10.1371/journal.pone.0049180 · DOI
  74. Meagher, 2015, Effects of degree and timing of social housing on reversal learning and response to novel objects in dairy calves, PLoS One, 10, e0132828, 10.1371/journal.pone.0132828 · DOI
  75. Meehan, 2007, The challenge of challenge: can problem solving opportunities enhance animal welfare?, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 102, 246, 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.031 · DOI · Paper page
  76. Mendl, 1999, Performing under pressure: stress and cognitive function, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 65, 221, 10.1016/S0168-1591(99)00088-X · DOI
  77. Mendl, 2001, Animal memory and animal welfare, Anim. Welf, 10, S141, 10.1017/S0962728600023587 · DOI
  78. Millot, 2013, Innovative behaviour in fish: atlantic cod can learn to use an external tag to manipulate a self-feeder, Anim. Cogn., 17, 779, 10.1007/s10071-013-0710-3 · DOI
  79. Mingle, 2014, Chimpanzees prefer African and Indian music over silence, J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Learn. Cogn., 40, 502, 10.1037/xan0000032 · DOI
  80. Murphy, 2014, A review of behavioural methods to study emotion and mood in pigs, Sus scrofa, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 159, 9, 10.1016/j.applanim.2014.08.002 · DOI
  81. Nicol, 1996, Farm animal cognition, Anim. Sci., 62, 375, 10.1017/S1357729800014934 · DOI
  82. Niemela, 2013, How does variation in the environment and individual cognition explain the existence of consistent behavioral differences?, Ecol. Evol., 3, 457, 10.1002/ece3.451 · DOI
  83. Novak, 2015, An exploration based cognitive bias test for mice: effects of handling method and stereotypic behaviour, PLoS One, 10, e0130718, 10.1371/journal.pone.0130718 · DOI
  84. Novak, 2015, Effect of cage-induced stereotypies on measures of affective state and recurrent perseveration in CD-1 and C57BL/6 mice, PLoS One, 11, e0153203, 10.1371/journal.pone.0153203 · DOI
  85. Oesterwind, 2016, Impact of structural and cognitive enrichment on the learning performance, behavior and physiology of dwarf goats (Capra aegagrus hircus), Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 177, 34, 10.1016/j.applanim.2016.01.006 · DOI
  86. Ogura, 2012, Use of video system and its effects on abnormal behaviour in captive Japanese macaques (Macaca fuscata), Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 141, 173, 10.1016/j.applanim.2012.06.009 · DOI
  87. Olsson, 2002, Improving housing conditions for laboratory mice: a review of environmental enrichment, Lab. Anim., 36, 243, 10.1258/002367702320162379 · DOI
  88. Otsuka, 2009, Discriminative and reinforcing stimulus properties of music for rats, Behav. Process., 80, 121, 10.1016/j.beproc.2008.10.009 · DOI
  89. Paul, 2005, Measuring emotional processes in animals: the utility of a cognitive approach, Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 29, 469, 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.01.002 · DOI
  90. Proudfoot, 2015, Social stress as a cause of diseases in farm animals: current knowledge and future directions, Vet. J., 206, 15, 10.1016/j.tvjl.2015.05.024 · DOI
  91. Puppe, 2007, Cognitive enrichment affects behavioural reactivity in domestic pigs, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 105, 75, 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.016 · DOI
  92. Rodenburg, 2003, Heritability of feather pecking and open-field response of laying hens at two different ages, Poult. Sci., 82, 861, 10.1093/ps/82.6.861 · DOI
  93. Roelofs, 2016, Making decisions under ambiguity: judgment bias tasks for assessing emotional state in animals, Front. Behav. Neurosci., 10, 1, 10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00119 · DOI
  94. Salvanes, 2013, Environmental enrichment promotes neural plasticity and cognitive ability in fish, Proc. R. Soc. B., 280, 20131331, 10.1098/rspb.2013.1331 · DOI
  95. Sánchez, 2009, Effects of feeding schedule on locomotor activity rhythms and stress response in sea bream, Physiol. Behav., 98, 125, 10.1016/j.physbeh.2009.04.020 · DOI
  96. Sarà, 2010, Changes in behavioural response of Mediterranean seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax L.) under different feeding distributions, Ital. J. Anim. Sci., 9.1, e23, 10.4081/ijas.2010.e23 · DOI
  97. Sherwin, 2007, The motivation of group-housed laboratory mice to leave an enriched laboratory cage, Anim. Behav., 73, 29, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.04.008 · DOI
  98. Shinozuka, 2013, Reinforcing and discriminative stimulus properties of music in goldfish, Behav. Process., 99, 26, 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.06.009 · DOI
  99. Sih, 2011, Effects of early stress on behavioral syndromes: an integrated adaptive perspective, Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 35, 1452, 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.03.015 · DOI
  100. Snowdon, 2010, Affective responses in tamarins elicited by species-specific music, Biol. Lett., 6, 30, 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0593 · DOI
  101. Snowdon, 2015, Cats prefer species-appropriate music, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 166, 106, 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.02.012 · DOI
  102. Stachurska, 2015, Does music influence emotional state in race horses?, J. Equine Vet. Sci., 35, 650, 10.1016/j.jevs.2015.06.008 · DOI
  103. Tahamtani, 2015, Early life in a barren environment adversely affects spatial cognition in laying hens (Gallus gallus domesticus), Front. Vet. Sci., 2, 1, 10.3389/fvets.2015.00003 · DOI
  104. Uetake, 1997, Effect of music on voluntary approach of dairy cows to an automatic milking system, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 53, 175, 10.1016/S0168-1591(96)01159-8 · DOI
  105. Vindas, 2012, Omission of expected reward agitates Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), Anim. Cogn., 15, 903, 10.1007/s10071-012-0517-7 · DOI
  106. Visintainer, 1982, Tumor rejection in rats after inescapable or escapable shock, Science, 216, 437, 10.1126/science.7200261 · DOI
  107. Watanabe, 1998, Reinforcing property of music in Java sparrows (Padda oryzivora), Behav. Process., 43, 211, 10.1016/S0376-6357(98)00014-X · DOI
  108. Watanabe, 1999, Discriminative stimulus properties of music in Java sparrows, Behav. Process., 47, 53, 10.1016/S0376-6357(99)00049-2 · DOI
  109. Webb, 2015, Does temperament affect learning in calves?, Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 165, 33, 10.1016/j.applanim.2015.01.013 · DOI
  110. Whitehouse, 2013, The impact of cognitive testing on the welfare of group housed primates, PLoS One, 8, e78308, 10.1371/journal.pone.0078308 · DOI
  111. Wolf, 2010, An explanatory framework for adaptive personality differences, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond.—Ser. B: Biol. Sci., 365, 3959, 10.1098/rstb.2010.0215 · DOI
  112. Wright, 2000, Music perception and octave generalization in rhesus monkeys, J. Exp. Psychol., 129, 291, 10.1037/0096-3445.129.3.291 · DOI
  113. Zebunke, 2011, Autonomic reactions indicating positive affect during acoustic reward learning in domestic pigs, Anim. Behav., 81, 481, 10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.11.023 · DOI
  114. Zebunke, 2013, Effects of cognitive enrichment on behavioural and physiological reactions of pigs, Physiol. Behav., 118, 70, 10.1016/j.physbeh.2013.05.005 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Franks, B.
Venue
Advances in Agricultural Animal Welfare
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2018
Pages
3-24
DOI
10.1016/b978-0-08-101215-4.00001-8
Cited by
17
References
5
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review