The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using the WAIS–IV/WMS–IV/ACS Following Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“There is also significant variability in cognitive performance among individuals with similar injury severity (Iverson, Holdnack, & Lange, 2013).”
From Using the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIHTB-CB) in individuals with traumatic brain injury. (2017) · cites this paper as Iverson, Holdnack, & Lange, 2013
In the citing paper
“Processing speed impariment represents another domain of cognitive functioning that is a well-documented sequela of TBI and, along with memory functioning, often yields the largest effect sizes (Iverson et al., 2013).”
From Using the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIHTB-CB) in individuals with traumatic brain injury. (2017) · cites this paper as Iverson et al., 2013
In the citing paper
“These results are similar to those obtained in other tests of episodic memory such as the fourth version of the Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS-IV) (Carlozzi, Grech, et al., 2013; Iverson et al., 2013).”
From Using the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIHTB-CB) in individuals with traumatic brain injury. (2017) · cites this paper as Iverson et al., 2013
In the citing paper
“Finally, on tests of language and crystalized abilities, the mild/moderate TBI group was not significantly different from the control group while the severe TBI group only showed a trend for lower reading scores (Carlozzi, Kirsch, et al., 2015; Iverson et al., 2013).”
From Using the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIHTB-CB) in individuals with traumatic brain injury. (2017) · cites this paper as Iverson et al., 2013
Citations
Cites
The Neuropsychological Assessment
Ogden, J. A. (2005) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195171358.003.0002 · Cited by 4,382
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale--Third Edition
Wechsler, D. (2019) · PsycTESTS Dataset · doi:10.1037/t49755-000 · Cited by 2,327
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale--Fourth Edition
Wechsler, D. (2012) · PsycTESTS Dataset · doi:10.1037/t15169-000 · Cited by 2,232
Major Depression Following Traumatic Brain Injury
Jorge, R. E., Robinson, R. G., Moser, D., Tateno, A., Crespo-Facorro, B., & Arndt, S. (2004) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.61.1.42 · Cited by 737
Outcome from mild traumatic brain injury
Iverson, G. L. (2005) · Current Opinion in Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/01.yco.0000165601.29047.ae · Cited by 696
Self-citationA quantitative review of the effects of traumatic brain injury on cognitive functioning
Schretlen, D. J., & Shapiro, A. M. (2003) · International Review of Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/09540260310001606728 · Cited by 645
Wechsler Memory Scale–Third Edition
Dumont, R., & Willis, J. O. (2008) · Encyclopedia of Special Education · doi:10.1002/9780470373699.speced2206 · Cited by 552
Outcome following traumatic brain injury: a comparison between 2 and 5 years after injury
OLVER, J. H., PONSFORD, J. L., & CURRAN, C. A. (1996) · Brain Injury · doi:10.1080/026990596123945 · Cited by 503
Neuropsychological outcome at 1-year post head injury.
DIKMEN, S. S., Machamer, J., Winn, H. R., & Temkin, N. R. (1995) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/0894-4105.9.1.80 · Cited by 464
Dikmen, S. S., Machamer, J. E., Powell, J. M., & Temkin, N. R. (2003) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/s0003-9993(03)00287-9 · Cited by 457
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Pearson, 2009
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Using the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIHTB-CB) in individuals with traumatic brain injury.
Tulsky, D. S., Carlozzi, N. E., Holdnack, J., Heaton, R. K., Wong, A., Goldsmith, A., & Heinemann, A. W. (2017) · Rehabilitation Psychology · doi:10.1037/rep0000174 · Cited by 67
Self-citationDuggan, E. C., Awakon, L., Loaiza, C. C., & García-Barrera, M. A. (2018) · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology · doi:10.1093/arclin/acy074 · Cited by 55
A Review of the Role of Auditory Evoked Potentials in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Assessment
Washnik, N. J., Anjum, J., Lundgren, K., & Phillips, S. (2019) · Trends in Hearing · doi:10.1177/2331216519840094 · Cited by 26
Comparing Composite Scores for the ANAM4 TBI-MIL for Research in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Iverson, G. L., Ivins, B. J., Karr, J. E., Crane, P. K., Lange, R. T., Cole, W. R., & Silverberg, N. D. (2019) · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology · doi:10.1093/arclin/acz021 · Cited by 22
Self-citationNgadimon, I. W., Mohan, D., Shaikh, M. F., Khoo, C. S., Tan, H. J., Chamhuri, N. S., Cheong, W. L., Aledo‐Serrano, Á., Yong, L. L., Lee, Y. M., et al. (2024) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/epi.18007 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Iverson, G. L., Holdnack, J. A., & Lange, R. T.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (US)
- Venue
- WAIS-IV, WMS-IV, and ACS
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 2013
- Pages
- 485-544
- OpenAlex
- W2498153676
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 1.36
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
- Keywords
- traumatic brain injury, moderate to severe TBI, cognitive impairment, WAIS-IV, social cognition, performance validity, memory impairment, working memory, processing speed, executive function
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
