CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 15Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionImpact of Technology on AdolescentsHate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Online social marketing approaches to inform cyber/bullying prevention and intervention: What have we learnt?

Spears, Barbara A., Taddeo, Carmel, Barnes, Alan·2018·Reducing Cyberbullying in Schools
DOI 10.1016/b978-0-12-811423-0.00006-7
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-12-811423-0.00006-7

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Barlett, 2017, From theory to practice: Cyberbullying theory and its application to intervention, Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 269, 10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.060 · DOI
  2. Connolly, 2014, Technology-enabled bullying and adolescent resistance to report: the need to examine causal factors, Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 11, 86, 10.1108/ITSE-04-2014-0003 · DOI
  3. Cortes, 2014, To tell or not to tell: what influences children’s decisions to report bullying to their teachers?, School Psychology Quarterly, 29, 336, 10.1037/spq0000078 · DOI
  4. Della Cioppa, 2015, Learning from traditional bullying interventions: A review of research on cyberbullying and best practice, Aggression and Violent Behavior, 23, 61, 10.1016/j.avb.2015.05.009 · DOI
  5. Doane, 2014, Predictors of cyberbullying perpetration among college students: An application of the theory of reasoned action, Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 154, 10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.051 · DOI
  6. Jiménez-Barbero, 2016, Effectiveness of anti-bullying school programs: A meta-analysis, Children and Youth Services Review, 61, 165, 10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.12.015 · DOI
  7. Kowalski, 2014, Bullying in the digital age: A critical review and meta-analysis of cyberbullying research among youth, Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1073, 10.1037/a0035618 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Lee, 2008, Social connectedness, extraversion, and subjective well-being: Testing a mediation model, Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 414, 10.1016/j.paid.2008.05.017 · DOI
  9. Menesini, 2017, Bullying in schools: The state of knowledge and effective interventions, Psychology, Health & Medicine, 1
  10. Merrell, 2008, How effective are school bullying intervention programs? A meta-analysis of intervention research, School Psychology Quarterly, 23, 26, 10.1037/1045-3830.23.1.26 · DOI
  11. Patchin, 2011, Traditional and nontraditional bullying among youth: A test of general strain theory, Youth and Society, 43, 727, 10.1177/0044118X10366951 · DOI
  12. Perugini, 2001, The role of desires and anticipated emotions in goal‐directed behaviors: Broadening and deepening the theory of planned behavior, British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 79, 10.1348/014466601164704 · DOI
  13. Polanin, 2012, A meta-analysis of school-based bullying prevention programs' effects on bystander intervention behavior, School Psychology Review, 41, 47, 10.1080/02796015.2012.12087375 · DOI
  14. Prochaska, 1983, Stages and processes of self-change in smoking: Toward an integrative model of change, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 5, 390, 10.1037/0022-006X.51.3.390 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Rigby, 2011, Is school bullying really on the rise?, Social Psychology of Education, 14, 441, 10.1007/s11218-011-9158-y · DOI
  16. Schultze‐Krumbholz, 2016, Feeling cybervictims’ pain—The effect of empathy training on cyberbullying, Aggressive Behavior, 42, 147, 10.1002/ab.21613 · DOI
  17. Smith, 2008, Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 376, 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01846.x · DOI · Paper page
  18. Smith, 2012, Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: A commentary, Journal of Experimental Criminology, 8, 433, 10.1007/s11292-012-9142-3 · DOI
  19. Smith, 2004, The effectiveness of whole-school anti-bullying programs: A synthesis of evaluation research, School Psychology Review, 33, 547, 10.1080/02796015.2004.12086267 · DOI
  20. Spears, 2009, Behind the scenes and screens: Insights into the human dimension of covert and cyberbullying, Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 217, 189, 10.1027/0044-3409.217.4.189 · DOI
  21. Spears, 2015, Cyberbullying, help-seeking and mental health in young Australians: Implications for public health, International Journal of Public Health, 60, 219, 10.1007/s00038-014-0642-y · DOI
  22. Thompson, 2012, Anti-bullying strategies in schools: What is done and what works, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2, 154
  23. Vreeman, 2007, A systematic review of school-based interventions to prevent bullying, Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 161, 78, 10.1001/archpedi.161.1.78 · DOI
  24. Waasdorp, 2015, The overlap between cyberbullying and traditional bullying, Journal of Adolescent Health, 56, 483, 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.12.002 · DOI
  25. Yeager, 2015, Declines in efficacy of anti-bullying programs among older adolescents: Theory and a three-level meta-analysis, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 37, 36, 10.1016/j.appdev.2014.11.005 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Spears, B. A., Taddeo, C., & Barnes, A.
Affiliations
University of South Australia (AU)
ORCID
Venue
Reducing Cyberbullying in Schools
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2018
Pages
75-94
DOI
10.1016/b978-0-12-811423-0.00006-7
OpenAlex
W2786963563
Cited by
15
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
FWCI
10.53
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Australian Government
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Keywords
cyberbullying, cyberbullying prevention, school-based intervention, youth co-design, protective factors, help-seeking, goal setting, social norms, perceived control, digital campaigns, youth online behavior, well-being

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review