Cited by 798Innovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEducational Strategies and EpistemologiesEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

Self-Regulated Learning

Boekaerts, Monique, Niemivirta, Markku·2000·Handbook of Self-Regulation

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-012109890-2/50042-1

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Compared to the previous handbook (Boekaerts et al., 2000), the recent handbook has no sections dedicated to presenting new models, being focused on specific aspects of SRL, which shows that the field has evolved and reached a more mature phase.

    “the recent handbook has no sections dedicated to presenting new models, being focused on specific aspects of SRL”

    From A Review of Self-regulated Learning: Six Models and Four Directions for Research (2017) · cites this paper as Boekaerts et al., 2000

  • Those goal pathways lead the regulatory actions that students do or do not activate.

    “Those pathways are the ones that lead the regulatory actions that the students do (or do not) activate (e.g., Boekaerts and Niemivirta, 2000).”

    From A Review of Self-regulated Learning: Six Models and Four Directions for Research (2017) · cites this paper as Boekaerts and Niemivirta, 2000

  • Boekaerts emphasizes the influence of emotions on students' goals and how this activates two possible pathways and different strategies.

    “In the first one (Boekaerts, 1991; Boekaerts and Niemivirta, 2000) emphasizes the influence of emotions in students’ goals and how this activates two possible pathways and different strategies.”

    From A Review of Self-regulated Learning: Six Models and Four Directions for Research (2017) · cites this paper as Boekaerts and Niemivirta, 2000

  • According to Boekaerts, students interpret the learning task and context, and then activate two different goal paths.

    “According to Boekaerts, the students “interpret” the learning task and context, and then activate two different goal paths.”

    From A Review of Self-regulated Learning: Six Models and Four Directions for Research (2017) · cites this paper as Boekaerts and Niemivirta, 2000

  • Boekaerts and Niemivirta (2000) were the first model to include the top-down/bottom-up categorization of self-regulation.

    “The first model that included this categorization of self-regulation was Boekaerts and Niemivirta (2000).”

    From A Review of Self-regulated Learning: Six Models and Four Directions for Research (2017) · cites this paper as Boekaerts and Niemivirta (2000)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boekaerts, M., & Niemivirta, M.
Affiliations
  • Leiden University (NL)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
Venue
Handbook of Self-Regulation
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2000
Pages
417-450
OpenAlex
W62042437
Cited by
798
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 41
FWCI
51.71
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
student self-regulation, self-regulation, metacognition, motivation, emotion regulation, volition, attentional control, appraisal process, identification procedures, student independence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review