Cited by 12Child Development and Digital TechnologyNutritional Studies and DietImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Associations of Contemporary Screen Time Modalities With Early Adolescent Nutrition

Open access
Nagata, Jason M., Weinstein, Shayna, Bashir, Ammal, Lee, Seohyeong, Al-shoaibi, Abubakr A.A., Shao, Iris Yuefan, Ganson, Kyle T., Testa, Alexander +2 more·2024·Academic Pediatrics

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the associations between screen time across several contemporary screen modalities (eg, television, video games, text, video chat, social media) and adherence to the Mediterranean-DASH (dietary approaches to stop hypertension) intervention for neurodegenerative delay (MIND) diet in early adolescents. METHODS: We analyzed data from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development study of 9 to 12-year-old adolescents in the United States. Multiple linear regression analyses examined the relationship between self-reported screen time measures at baseline (year 0) and the 1-year follow-up (year 1) and caregiver-reported nutrition assessments at year 1, providing a prospective and cross-sectional analysis. Cross-sectional marginal predicted probabilities were calculated. RESULTS: In a sample of 8267 adolescents (49.0% female, 56.9% white), mean age 10 years, total screen time increased from 3.80 h/d at year 0 to 4.61 h/d at year 1. Change in total screen time from year 0 and year 1 was associated with lower nutrition scores at year 1. PROSPECTIVE: Screen time spent on television, video games, and videos at year 0 was associated with lower nutrition scores at year 1. Cross-sectional: Screen time spent on television, video games, videos, texting, and social media at year 1 was associated with lower MIND diet scores at year 1. CONCLUSIONS: Both traditional (television) and several contemporary modalities of screen time are associated, prospectively and cross-sectionally, with lower overall diet quality, measured by the MIND diet nutrition score, in early adolescents. Future studies should further explore the effect of rising digital platforms and media on overall adolescent nutrition.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.acap.2024.01.023

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The effect sizes per hour of screen time in this study are similar in magnitude to previously reported effect sizes for screen time and nutrition as measured by the MIND diet score.

    “These effect sizes per hour of screen time are similar in magnitude to the effect sizes previously reported on screen time and nutrition as measured by the MIND (Mediterranean-DASH [Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension] Intervention for Neurodegenerative Delay) diet score [114].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Przybylski AK, Orben A, Weinstein N. How much is too much? Examining the relationship between digital screen engagement and psychosocial functioning in a confirmatory cohort study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020;59(9):1080-1088. doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2019.06.017 J o u r n a l P r e -p r o o f · DOI
  2. Falbe J, Willett WC, Rosner B, Gortmaker SL, Sonneville KR, Field AE. Longitudinal relations of television, electronic games, and digital versatile discs with changes in diet in adolescents123. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;100(4):1173-1181. doi:10.3945/ajcn.114.088500 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nagata, J. M., Weinstein, S., Bashir, A., Lee, S., Al-shoaibi, A. A. A., Shao, I. Y., Ganson, K. T., Testa, A., He, J., & Garber, A. K.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Nagata, Jason M.
Venue
Academic Pediatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-07
Volume
24
Issue
5
Pages
748-754
ISSN
1876-2859 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391474551
Cited by
12
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1
FWCI
15.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Academic Pediatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (U01DA041048, U01DA041025, U24DA041147, U01DA041156, U01DA041106, U01DA041120, U01DA041117, U01DA041093, U01DA041089, U01DA041134, U24DA041123, U01DA041022, U01DA041028, U01DA041174, U01DA041148)
  • Doris Duke Charitable Foundation
  • National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (K08HL159350)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH135492)
  • American Heart Association Inc
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
screen time, adolescent nutrition, MIND diet, diet quality, television, video games, social media, text messaging, video chat, digital media, early adolescents
MeSH terms
Screen Time, Adolescent, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Nutritional Status, Prospective Studies, Television, United States, Nutrition Assessment, Linear Models, Video Games, Diet, Mediterranean, Text Messaging, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review